Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Things we'd be talking about if the forum wasn't deadFollow

#2327 Dec 17 2015 at 12:43 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
6,543 posts
I'm really bored so I'm gonna talk about that last job I stayed a long time with. If you haven't guessed by now, it was with Walmart. --and if you really want to get technical about it, I was really with them for more like 8 years overall if you don't count the time I spent on and off. I had to break away from them a few times moving from Florida to Texas and back again and wasn't able to transfer, but always managed to get re-hired by them almost immediately after.

"Walmart!?" you might say. "Why, that's a terrible company! No wonder it was such ****! Why didn't you just get a better job?" you might ask. Well, here's the kicker: When you have no money at all and you're desperate for work, you have to apply everywhere. I must have sent out hundreds of applications, praying to a God I don't believe in (yup there's the problem right there God ******* hates me for not loving him ayup) for anything better than Walmart. (My favorite part about all of this is spending hours filling out psych evaluation questions where I must pretend to be a mindless subservient robot in all of my answers.)

I managed to get into a few interviews with some other places, like an Amscot in Orlando. It was a two hour drive from home, but I shaved off all my hair and put on deodorant and a tie and my best impression of a fine, upstanding gentleman. Well, like all other non-Walmart interviews, it ended with a lot of fake smiles and politeness and a "we'll call you" as I walked back to my car, humiliated, wondering why I had just done that to myself and wasted so much precious fuel to get there and back.

You see, here in reality, finding a job is a heck of a lot like finding a girlfriend. First you need to look for someone who's actually looking for someone. Then you need to meet all of their standards and needs. Then you need compete and be better than all the hundreds of other people who are after the same job. You need consent from the employer to take up a job with them. You can't just take from them and hope you don't leave a mark. What does that leave you with? It leaves you with Walmart. That's what it leaves you with. When nobody else will call you, Walmart will.

It doesn't matter who you are. If you get a call from Walmart for an interview you can bet your *** they are going to hire you on the spot, as soon as you arrive. You get an interview, but it doesn't even matter what you say or how you answer the questions. They need someone RIGHT NOW and it might as well be you. The interview itself is always the hardest part, because they'll ask you all the same kinds of questions as anyone else, but you know that they aren't taking you seriously-- that they just need another warm body to fill a hole with-- but you do your best to play along and act like it's all serious business before they ask you how much you think your pay should be like you have some kind of say in that and you almost lose your composure to all the white-hot rage you are feeling underneath.

From this point on the experience kind of varies by location. Here's some advice for anyone who finds themselves forced to work for Walmart: Don't learn how to do anything. Don't offer to cut keys, or mix paint, or issue fishing licenses. When they hand you a Telxon portable computer/scanner device, tell them you don't have a login set up with it yet (because you probably actually won't anyway.) Just don't. You will take on so much more responsibility and nothing else will change. If you do this, on top of all your regular work, you will be paged constantly to hurry all over the store to take care of impatient and ungrateful customers who all feel they're entitled to being treated like ******* royalty by you, the lowly Walmart peasant. You will get payed exactly the same as you would as the guy who has been there for ten years who never touched any of that ****.

You won't get treated any better, and most of all, you WILL NOT MOVE UP. If all of the management in your store suddenly died together in a fiery crash aboard the same airplane, YOU are not the person to replace them. They will bring in people from outside the store, even outside the company. You are a peasant. They are nobles. You should be happy and feel honored to be making as much as you do because you are all apart of one big happy Walmart family-- family in the kind of sense that you are their dog or cat, and you are serving people who are better than you.

I could write about this all day, but I have better things to do. Not really
____________________________
Galkaman wrote:
Kuwoobie will die crushed under the burden of his mediocrity.

#2328 Dec 17 2015 at 1:50 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
But they're the biggest employer and job creator in the country. This is the pinnacle of capitalism and a model of how our economy is supposed to run. Working as intended.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#2329 Dec 17 2015 at 3:42 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
:DRYVRS Episode 1, or "This is how Home Alone 3 should have gone." NSFW

Yes, that is Macauley Culkin.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#2330 Dec 18 2015 at 8:32 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
CBSnews wrote:
Tom Smith, a family pastor who also helps with church security, was shot by his own gun safety instructor.

Modesto Police say they were acting out a scenario when a loaded gun the instructor was holding accidentally went off. They say they gun fired at the end of class after the instructor put a mock gun down and picked up his real loaded gun.

Police say so far it's unclear if the instructor believed he was using the mock gun he had been using to teach the class.

The shooting incident comes at a time when church members in California are training to carry concealed weapons in response to recent mass shootings like those at San Bernardino and at A.M.E. Church in Charleston, South Carolina.
"Okay class, the first thing you do is just pick up the weapon ... No, no you don't need to check if it's loaded or if there's a round in the chamber or anything, just pick it up and put your finger firmly on the trigger, and wave it all about like so ..." If only the pastor had a gun to protect himself from the person he hired to teach him how to protect himself with a gun from guns. I guess the scenario they were acting out was "What happens when an idiot gets a gun." Guns don't "accidentally" go off, the instructor was being unsafe.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#2331 Dec 18 2015 at 9:22 AM Rating: Good
***
1,159 posts
You forgot the bit where you hold it sideways, gangster style.
____________________________
Timelordwho wrote:
I'm not quite sure that scheming is an emotion.
#2332 Dec 18 2015 at 11:50 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
6,543 posts
Quote:
They say they gun fired at the end of class


Does no one proofread their articles before publishing them online anymore? It's not a big deal, but I've been seeing stuff like this a lot lately.
____________________________
Galkaman wrote:
Kuwoobie will die crushed under the burden of his mediocrity.

#2333 Dec 18 2015 at 9:15 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Kuwoobie wrote:
From this point on the experience kind of varies by location. Here's some advice for anyone who finds themselves forced to work for Walmart: Don't learn how to do anything. Don't offer to cut keys, or mix paint, or issue fishing licenses. When they hand you a Telxon portable computer/scanner device, tell them you don't have a login set up with it yet (because you probably actually won't anyway.) Just don't. You will take on so much more responsibility and nothing else will change. If you do this, on top of all your regular work, you will be paged constantly to hurry all over the store to take care of impatient and ungrateful customers who all feel they're entitled to being treated like ******* royalty by you, the lowly Walmart peasant. You will get payed exactly the same as you would as the guy who has been there for ten years who never touched any of that ****.


So you do the bare minimum work necessary to fill a job slot, make no effort to increase your skills, and in fact actively work to avoid doing so, and you wonder why you're not moving upward. Hmmm...

Quote:
You won't get treated any better, and most of all, you WILL NOT MOVE UP. If all of the management in your store suddenly died together in a fiery crash aboard the same airplane, YOU are not the person to replace them. They will bring in people from outside the store, even outside the company. You are a peasant. They are nobles.


And they all just magically became nobles to your peasantness. It was a birthright. Or blind luck. Or something. Where do you suppose they came from? What did they do differently that made them the people the bosses turn to when they need a responsible skilled person to take some kind of position of power/responsibility in their workforce? Maybe you should figure that out and do that instead? Just a suggestion.


Look. I'm not proposing that rising through the ranks of Walmart is a great business plan, but it does look as though at least part of your problem is your own attitude towards work. You're starting out with the "I can't succeed, so there's no point in trying" assumption. Um... And as long as you think that, you've pretty much guaranteed that you never will.

Quote:
You should be happy and feel honored to be making as much as you do because you are all apart of one big happy Walmart family-- family in the kind of sense that you are their dog or cat, and you are serving people who are better than you.


Again, the key point is to figure out how they got to be "better than you", and try to do the same things. Have you stopped and talked to those who are earning more than you and asked about how they did it? Maybe express an interest in doing the same? You might be surprised at how they aren't the evil enemy at all, and will be more than willing to help mentor you, and if you actually spend the effort, then it'll be your name they turn to when they need a position to fill that pays more than door greeter. But you will never ever ever get there just sitting around doing the bare minimum and making no effort to get noticed except for when you ***** up.

Advancement is as much about social skills as physical job skills. Especially when you're at/near the bottom, and you don't yet have those job skills. You get them by talking to people who have them and learning from them. Sitting in housewares trying to avoid attracting too much attention from your manager while slacking through a shift to collect a meager paycheck will result in you doing nothing but earning a meager paycheck. Forever.

Edited, Dec 18th 2015 7:17pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#2334 Dec 18 2015 at 10:04 PM Rating: Good
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,957 posts
gbaji wrote:
Advancement is as much about social skills as physical job skills.
Mostly the social skill of knowing the "right" people, which most people don't, because they are the "wrong" people. You'll deny this, of course, because you're as blind as Anne Frank.
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#2335 Dec 19 2015 at 4:54 AM Rating: Excellent
****
4,140 posts
gbaji wrote:
So you do the bare minimum work necessary to fill a job slot, make no effort to increase your skills, and in fact actively work to avoid doing so, and you wonder why you're not moving upward. Hmmm...


[:sigh:] He was using his experience to show what to do, as opposed to what he had done. He was passing along his hard won wisdom.

Reading comprehension fail on your part gbaji. As per usual.
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#2336 Dec 19 2015 at 6:03 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Kuwoobie wrote:
Quote:
They say they gun fired at the end of class


Does no one proofread their articles before publishing them online anymore? It's not a big deal, but I've been seeing stuff like this a lot lately.
Also, to be pedantic, it's an unnecessary statement. When someone in class gets shot, class is officially over.
#2337 Dec 19 2015 at 9:45 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
6,543 posts
gbaji wrote:

So you do the bare minimum work necessary to fill a job slot, make no effort to increase your skills, and in fact actively work to avoid doing so, and you wonder why you're not moving upward. Hmmm...


D'awww. Looks like you strained yourself trying to understand what I was saying again. I was the one doing all of the work. I was their "go-to guy." I was the sucker. I spent years picking up the slack for everyone else and had nothing to show for it. I wasn't the only one, either. That is the lesson to be learned here.

gbaji wrote:
And they all just magically became nobles to your peasantness. It was a birthright. Or blind luck. Or something. Where do you suppose they came from? What did they do differently that made them the people the bosses turn to when they need a responsible skilled person to take some kind of position of power/responsibility in their workforce? Maybe you should figure that out and do that instead? Just a suggestion.


It was their birthright, and it was luck. They were born to families who could afford to jump them through all the hoops of pretentiousness. They are the friends are relatives of the people who mattered. They sure as hell weren't people who actually worked for Wal-Mart.

gbaji wrote:

Look. I'm not proposing that rising through the ranks of Walmart is a great business plan, but it does look as though at least part of your problem is your own attitude towards work. You're starting out with the "I can't succeed, so there's no point in trying" assumption. Um... And as long as you think that, you've pretty much guaranteed that you never will.


My point is, working harder and being optimistic and otherwise doing more to help them is not helping yourself. What we represent is something that is completely disposable to them. They don't need to recognize your work because they don't have to. They don't need to pay more because they don't have to. You are absolutely right when you say the work isn't worth a higher wage, because it isn't worth anything at all. If the minimum wage suddenly disappeared right now, they'd be able to thumb through applications and find people who would practically be volunteers, you know, people like you with that "can do" attitude who'd be willing to start at $0.10 an hour and "work their way up" to $0.17 after thirty or so years.

Quote:
Again, the key point is to figure out how they got to be "better than you"


...and there lies my key point. These people aren't "better than me." Not even fucking close. I have talked to them about how they got to be where they are actually. Many of them, (but not all!), are lazy, stupid, and completely worthless people. Go and work for Wal-Mart if you love being forced to take orders from people who are smaller, weaker and dumber than you. Most of the stores I worked for barely made it by because of how utterly incompetent the people running it were. There was nothing the rest of us could do about it but laugh at their stupidity between desperately looking for a way out.

Edited, Dec 19th 2015 6:48pm by Kuwoobie
____________________________
Galkaman wrote:
Kuwoobie will die crushed under the burden of his mediocrity.

#2338 Jan 03 2016 at 12:47 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
6,543 posts
So apparently there's some fuss going on in Oregon where some fellows of Clive Bundy are sitting in at some national wildlife refuge and acting all dramatic, waving guns around and such. I imagine they'll threaten to kill police officers and point their guns at feds but nothing will be done to them about it, and they'll go along their merry way as always. -OR- maybe this time things will escalate and all these "freedom fighters" and "patriots" can prove they're more than just talk as they all die like dogs for their lost cause.
____________________________
Galkaman wrote:
Kuwoobie will die crushed under the burden of his mediocrity.

#2339 Jan 03 2016 at 6:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Armed extremists take federal building. Fox News cheers. Same ole same ole.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#2340 Jan 03 2016 at 7:32 PM Rating: Good
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,957 posts
CNN wrote:
"We are not terrorists," Ammon Bundy said.
Yeah, you are you chucklehead.Smiley: oyvey
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#2341 Jan 04 2016 at 1:31 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Friar Bijou wrote:
CNN wrote:
"We are not terrorists," Ammon Bundy said.
Yeah, you are you chucklehead.Smiley: oyvey


They aren't terrorists. Terrorists are a fairly specific thing; they mount attacks in order to inspire terror among civilian populations in order to raise awareness for their cause.

They are, however, rebels; more specifically particularist rebels.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#2342 Jan 04 2016 at 5:39 AM Rating: Good
***
1,159 posts
It's an old US tradition to have a large group of crazy people with guns on a compound somewhere.
____________________________
Timelordwho wrote:
I'm not quite sure that scheming is an emotion.
#2343 Jan 04 2016 at 6:22 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I keep thinking how different the response would be if they were Muslim-Americans, or African-Americans, or Mexican-Americans, or pretty much anything besides white trash entitled rancher Americans.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#2344 Jan 04 2016 at 7:53 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Timelordwho wrote:
They aren't terrorists. Terrorists are a fairly specific thing; they mount attacks in order to inspire terror among civilian populations in order to raise awareness for their cause.

They are, however, rebels; more specifically particularist rebels.

Agreed that "terrorist" doesn't seem to fit. Extremist does, though. A group of people taking a piece of federal property and holding it via the threat of armed force to get their political demands met certainly counts as "extreme".
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#2345 Jan 04 2016 at 8:04 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
There might be exacerbating elements who railroad them towards violence, but I'm not sure that is true. BLM/occupy have taken up residence in public buildings, and made it out more or less intact. Mexican Americans are generally more concerned with not being on police radar to occupy federal property, but they have peacefully protested things like Trump rallies.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#2346 Jan 04 2016 at 8:28 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
Terrorists are a fairly specific thing; they mount attacks in order to inspire terror among civilian populations in order to raise awareness for their cause.
The definition also includes acts to affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct, which these shmucks are definitely involved in. It's also an armed occupation of a federal building, so could be viewed as behavior that's dangerous to human life that violates state or federal law.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#2347 Jan 04 2016 at 8:38 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
The Southern Poverty Law Center classifies this as antigovernment extremism, and tracks it back 20 years or so (I'd put it farther back than that, personally - see Sagebrush Rebellion). No surprise, they tend to rear their terrified little heads during Democratic Presidencies.

They SAY they want less Federal interference. What they MEAN is that they want to clear cut, mine, overgraze and generally ruin land that the government has set aside as wilderness areas.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#2348 Jan 04 2016 at 8:53 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
Terrorists are a fairly specific thing; they mount attacks in order to inspire terror among civilian populations in order to raise awareness for their cause.
The definition also includes acts to affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct, which these shmucks are definitely involved in. It's also an armed occupation of a federal building, so could be viewed as behavior that's dangerous to human life that violates state or federal law.


I guess if you want to use a new (bad) definition of terrorism, which means yelling at the post office about stamp prices is also terrorism. The intimidation or coercion has to be aimed specifically at the populace and NOT the government to be accurately described as terrorism.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#2349 Jan 04 2016 at 9:00 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
I guess if you want to use a new (bad) definition of terrorism, which means yelling at the post office about stamp prices is also terrorism.
It's the FBI's definition, and I personally wouldn't consider yelling dangerous to human life, or really violating any actual laws.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#2350 Jan 04 2016 at 9:06 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
The FBI's definition is necessarily self serving; they are in the business of executing state control, and this want the definition to be as broad as possible, as it allows them certain legal powers created under anti-terror statutes. The UN definition of "Criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the general public" is more accurate.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#2351 Jan 04 2016 at 9:09 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I don't think it's terrorism. I do think it's treason. Or maybe sedition; I've never been clear on what constitutes sedition, exactly.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 243 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (243)