Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Jeramiah Right is funny.Follow

#27 Apr 29 2008 at 6:28 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
I don't think Wright's a racist, but I do think he's a selfish bastage. What a way to pay back a man that stuck by you, asshat. At the very least, he could have laid low till after November, but I guess like any good preacher, he needs new rims on the caddy and a new pinky ring.
#28 Apr 29 2008 at 11:25 AM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
/agree

I think Wright's looking at the controversy as a way to make a name for himself nationally. It's certainly working. 6 months ago, he would not have gotten the chance to be a keynote speaker at the NAACP diner they had Sunday. Today, he's looking at speaking engagements, a book deal, probably gets product endorsements, who knows? I just kinda assumed he saw this as his payday, and really doesn't care how this affect Obama at all.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#29 Apr 29 2008 at 11:41 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

doesn't care how this affect Obama at all.


Yeah, almost as if THERE WERE VIRTUALLY NO REAL TIES BETWEEN THE TWO MEN beyond one happening to be in the building when the other spoke on occasion.

How can this be? I mean, Wright's dictating to Obama on all matters of faith, isn't he? He's the puppet master!

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#30 Apr 29 2008 at 12:04 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

doesn't care how this affect Obama at all.


Yeah, almost as if THERE WERE VIRTUALLY NO REAL TIES BETWEEN THE TWO MEN beyond one happening to be in the building when the other spoke on occasion.


The argument is that Obama chose this church, therefore he presumably agreed with its precepts. Honestly, the posted 12-point value system of the church is really of far greater concern then the sermons themselves. It was never about how close the two men were personally.


Oh. And for those who aren't aware of the "12-point value system" Obama's church followed (and which presumably he must have known about having attended for 20 years):


Quote:
1. Commitment to God

2. Commitment to the Black Community

3. Commitment to the Black Family

4. Dedication to the Pursuit of Education

5. Dedication to the Pursuit of Excellence

6. Adherence to the Black Work Ethic

7. Commitment to Self-Discipline and Self-Respect

8. Disavowal of the Pursuit of "Middleclassness"

9. Pledge to make the fruits of all developing and acquired skills available to the Black Community

10. Pledge to Allocate Regularly, a Portion of Personal Resources for Strengthening and Supporting Black Institutions

11. Pledge allegiance to all Black leadership who espouse and embrace the Black Value System

12. Personal commitment to embracement of the Black Value System.”



Gee. This all looks like stuff a centrist candidate who's "above race" would commit his life to. Certainly, no one should have *any* concerns about Obama's positions on race at all, right?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#31 Apr 29 2008 at 12:10 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Gee. This all looks like stuff a centrist candidate who's "above race" would commit his life to. Certainly, no one should have *any* concerns about Obama's positions on race at all, right?


What might those concerns be? I'd really like to know. What's the worst case scenario, in your mind. The 1% chance of him enacting a policy on race that would be the worst?

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#32 Apr 29 2008 at 12:23 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Gee. This all looks like stuff a centrist candidate who's "above race" would commit his life to. Certainly, no one should have *any* concerns about Obama's positions on race at all, right?


What might those concerns be? I'd really like to know. What's the worst case scenario, in your mind. The 1% chance of him enacting a policy on race that would be the worst?


It calls to question his entire stated position on the issue Smash. When his campaign says he's "above race", finding out that he's attended a church for 20 years that has (among others) the stated value to "Pledge allegiance to all Black leadership who espouse and embrace the Black Value System" should put huge warning flares up in most sane people's minds.


As an exercise in racial awareness, replace all instances of "black" in those 12 points with the word "white" and tell me exactly how far a political candidate would get if he'd attended a church with those posted values.


I thought the whole "ending racism" thing meant treating people the same regardless of skin color? Aren't we supposed to judge people by the "content of their character" and not the "color of their skin"? Strange set of values then, wouldn't you agree? And if you are ok with it, but not if Obama were white with a set of similar "white" values, aren't *you* being racist (treating him differently because of the color of his skin)?


I think so. And if we judge Obama by the "content of his character", we're left with a man who claims one thing to advance his political career, while pledging to something completely different in his private life. If you don't think that's significant, then you are far more politically blind then I already think you are...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#33 Apr 29 2008 at 1:17 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
That's nice.

Care to take a whack at answering my question?

What's the worst thing you think could happen because of your belief that Obama is biased towards blacks and blaming whites for the ills of blacks. That's the argument, right?

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#34 Apr 29 2008 at 2:05 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Ok, I know this goes against the grain of the general attitude of this board, but upon first blush I am always willing to give the benefit of the doubt to pastors. The idea that Wright is selling out for money goes against what I believe is the reason people go into pastoring a church. Now I recognise that regardless of the profession there will always be someone who enters into any given field for personal gain. That being said, I don't think that is the norm or even close to being something other than rare.

I just don't see Wright doing this for personal gain despite anything that he may receive for his notoriety/fame. If anything, I think he might be doing this to further his agenda concerning blacks as a whole, even at the expense of Obama's presidency. Crazy as it might sound, Wright may be looking at the black community further down the road than merely four years of a black being Commander-in-Chief.

Counterintuitive, right? But perhaps from Wright's perspective this is an opportunity to highlight issues near and dear to his heart beyond a man who has already publically disavowed his teachings and belief structure. So what I'm saying is I have failed to see this through the eyes of a black man. Yeah, weird, I know. Maybe Wright has already written off Obama as having caved to White America in an attempt to make himself more palatable to the voters in the general election (in Wright's opinion).

Hmmmm.

Totem
#35 Apr 29 2008 at 2:07 PM Rating: Good
Meh, Obama spoke out today against Wright's comments. It's a 180 on that now famous speech on race he made a few weeks ago, but one that had to be done.

It's weird, it's almost like Wright is going out of his way to get Hillary the nomination, which in all fairness, would go directly against Mr. Wright's own racial interests.

As for Obama being "above race", do I have to remind you that he's half white and of vastly different religious backgrounds as well (And no, despite popular beleif, Barry was at no time a Muslim).
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#36 Apr 29 2008 at 2:11 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Maybe Wright has already written off Obama as having caved to White America in an attempt to make himself more palatable to the voters in the general election


Anyone with a pulse would have come to this conclusion before the caucus in Iowa.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#37 Apr 29 2008 at 2:43 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
That's nice.

Care to take a whack at answering my question?

What's the worst thing you think could happen because of your belief that Obama is biased towards blacks and blaming whites for the ills of blacks. That's the argument, right?



The worst? Let's see.... White people being put in internment camps for their evil deeds in the past. Laws being passed that give preferential hiring to people based on their skin color (oops! We already have those...). White people being forced to pay reparations for slavery. White people being singled out in any of a number of ways to "pay back" for the sins of the past (regardless of their degree of involvement).


Honestly though, that's not relevant. I could ask you the same question in reverse. What would be the worst thing you think could happen if a white candidate was elected who attended a church with the same stated positions reversed?


Kinda the same thing right?


The relevant point is that the white guy would be universally opposed as a national candidate for president, yet some people overlook such racism if the person involved happens to have a darker skin color.


If you're ok with one but not the other, then *you* are the racist.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#38 Apr 29 2008 at 2:45 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Honestly though, that's not relevant. I could ask you the same question in reverse. What would be the worst thing you think could happen if a white candidate was elected who attended a church with the same stated positions reversed?


I wouldn't be bothered by it, at all. Well, I'd be bothered he was pretending to believe in an invisible man in the sky who watched over him, but beyond that, really not a factor to me. I guess I'd give him points for being honest instead of lying about his feelings towards race, maybe.



____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#39 Apr 29 2008 at 3:00 PM Rating: Excellent
The more I ponder on this, the more I believe this was a tactically orchestrated move by BOTH Obama and Wright.

A bit of fan fiction:

Obama: They're gonna keep bringing up our connection. I can't shake it man.
Wright: No worries my son, I got your back. See, I need to keep MY name in the news to sell books, one way or another. But since I'm retired, any publicity is good publicity. The nuttier I appear, the more curious my readers will be.
Obama: So you're going to play the "angry black man" on purpose?
Wright: Yessir Barack. And you're going to hear me going nuts, and you will have the perfect opportunity to "reject and denounce" me as you see fit.
Obama: I can't just throw you under the bus.
Wright: You're a politician, you gotta do the political thing. At this point I don't care; my legacy will be in my writing from here on out. You're no good to me if you're not president anyway.
Obama: *laugh* Just don't go too overboard.
Wright: If one press club meeting ain't enough, I'll go on Fox News myself. But remember: the codewords are, "You're a politician. I'm a pastor." Got it?
Obama: I'll remember.



Edited, Apr 29th 2008 7:02pm by catwho
#40 Apr 29 2008 at 3:52 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Honestly though, that's not relevant. I could ask you the same question in reverse. What would be the worst thing you think could happen if a white candidate was elected who attended a church with the same stated positions reversed?


I wouldn't be bothered by it, at all. Well, I'd be bothered he was pretending to believe in an invisible man in the sky who watched over him, but beyond that, really not a factor to me. I guess I'd give him points for being honest instead of lying about his feelings towards race, maybe.


 
            ^ 
           /|\ 
          / | \ 
            | 
            | 
            | 
            | 


I call shenanigans!!!!
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#41 Apr 29 2008 at 3:52 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I believe this was a tactically orchestrated move by BOTH Obama and Wright.


Neither one strikes me as that clever. If Obama could come up with that, he'd be able to not look like a 4 year old in a debate.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#42 Apr 29 2008 at 4:01 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
Quote:
The worst? Let's see.... White people being put in internment camps for their evil deeds in the past. Laws being passed that give preferential hiring to people based on their skin color (oops! We already have those...). White people being forced to pay reparations for slavery. White people being singled out in any of a number of ways to "pay back" for the sins of the past (regardless of their degree of involvement).


And the president can do all that, right?

Not anymore than he could as a Senator, unless you're going to argue that he's more influential as president. Well whoop dee doo.

Not that it matters if your concerns aren't reflected in his policies.
#43 Apr 29 2008 at 4:03 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I call shenanigans


When have you seen me decry a candidate's stance on race?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#44 Apr 29 2008 at 4:10 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

I call shenanigans


When have you seen me decry a candidate's stance on race?


Have someone with premium do a search for posts of yours in which you've called republicans "racist" for one reason or another if you want. I don't think I really have to...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#45 Apr 29 2008 at 4:24 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Have someone with premium do a search for posts of yours in which you've called republicans "racist" for one reason or another if you want. I don't think I really have to...


They are racists. You're a racist. That doesn't mean I wouldn't vote for you if your platform furthered my interests.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#46 Apr 29 2008 at 4:38 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Have someone with premium do a search for posts of yours in which you've called republicans "racist" for one reason or another if you want. I don't think I really have to...


They are racists. You're a racist. That doesn't mean I wouldn't vote for you if your platform furthered my interests.



Ah. So you just assume that everyone on the right is racist, so it's ok for folks on the left to be racist too? Two wrongs make a Wright, I guess...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#47 Apr 29 2008 at 4:40 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Ah. So you just assume that everyone on the right is racist


Not at all. I don't think McCain's racist at all.

Many on the right are, obviously, it's the party of the KKK after all. Just as many on the left are crazy environmentalists, we're the party of EarthFirst.

You're clearly racists because of your oft stated beliefs on this forum.

It's not really a big deal, I wish you'd just embrace it and be fine with it. You can say it "I dislike black people and Hispanics and think they're drain on society" It's a perfectly arguable position backed up by statistics.




____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#48 Apr 29 2008 at 6:54 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
"Anyone with a pulse would have come to this conclusion before the caucus in Iowa." --Smash

Except no one knew who Rev. Wright was in Iowa back in the fall. No, I think this is a recent decision on his part based on how Obama equivocated once those sermon sound bites came out in the news. There is no evidence that Wright planned this and was waiting for the most opportune moment to torpedo Barry's campaign. He just saw which way the political wind was blowing and realized that this is the time to make a move before the political spotlight found something else to focus on.

Totem
#49 Apr 29 2008 at 6:55 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

No, I think this is a recent decision on his part based on how Obama equivocated once those sermon sound bites came out in the news. There is no evidence that Wright planned this and was waiting for the most opportune moment to torpedo Barry's campaign. He just saw which way the political wind was blowing and realized that this is the time to make a move before the political spotlight found something else to focus on.


Yeah, who knows. Neither of is going to be very good at assessing the motives of a crazy black preacher.


____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#50 Apr 29 2008 at 7:49 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Sure is fun to watch though.

Totem
#51 Apr 29 2008 at 9:04 PM Rating: Good
That depends on where you're sitting. But you should be use to the dems shooting themselves in the foot: RE: Dean, Kerry, & Wright.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 14 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (14)