Quote:
BTW, contradiction my friend:
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, I don't take sides on this console war.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and change sides if I think my current choice is not the better.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah.
Yeah, I should have expressed myself better (in my defense, english is not my native language). My point is: I choose the product that I think it is the best one at one point. But defending a console as it was a religion is stupid.
I'll choose one side at one point, but I'm not defending that side on flame wars. Clear now?
Quote:
FYI: Loyalty has a lot to do with personal preference. Duh...
Same as above. When I said "Loyalty" I meant people like "PS2 0wNz M$ ORZ".
I chose PS2 because I think it had the games I liked best. But if the same games were released for XBOX, or if Sony started to ***** me I would not be ashamed of giving M$ some bucks just because it's M$.
In other words, I'm not a Sony, Nintendo or MS fan.
Quote:
FYI: Loyalty has a lot to do with personal preference. Duh...
That's why I told this discussion is pointless. It's not taking anybody anywhere.
Quote:
Now before you guys jump on me for being so anti-microsoft, you must understand something. I have been in my field for close to 11 years now. I have seen what Microsoft has done with the applications and operating systems they have released. I have seen what I consider to be true evil. However, if you are interested in educating yourself about Microsoft, there is an organization that I have been a member of for quite sometime.
I know a lot of people like this. The "open-source guys". While I think there are many good open-source alternatives, I also think there are many crap open-source solutions as well. I have my mind open for anything regardless of brands.
MS just does what any other software corporation do. They have intentions of eliminating any other kind of competition and menace, like any other software corporation do. Recent example: PeopleSoft acquisition by Oracle.
I'm also in this field for some time, and every time I see somebody adopting open source solutions, it's not because it's "cool", but because in the end there were financial advantages (I'm not talking about licensing only, but overall cost/benefit) in the end.
It's not MS that is evil. It is the business world.
Anyway, I know I'm not convincing you of anything, and the opposite is also true. If you have some comments about that yet, feel free to PM, because I'm probably skipping this thread from now on.
Note: Edited for spelling
Edited, Sat Nov 26 00:10:49 2005 by adrianomp