Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Can I solo up to level 60?Follow

#1 Nov 17 2006 at 9:37 AM Rating: Decent
Do you think I can solo up to level 60? Currently level 22 Shaman Troll. (Or would that be Troll Shaman?)
#2 Nov 17 2006 at 9:39 AM Rating: Decent
Yes you can solo up to 60. (and it would be Troll Shaman i "think")
#3 Nov 17 2006 at 10:11 AM Rating: Decent
*
167 posts
Yes, you could, but that kind of defeats the purpose of a multiuser game. Most of the fun I have is in the people I know. Grouping with people (especially in instances) allows you to learn the true strengths and weaknesses of your chosen class and how to play it effectively in a team. Some knowledge of this pre-60 will be very helpful because unless you only PvP at 60 (and then 70), dungeons will be the only way to improve your kit.
#4 Nov 17 2006 at 12:09 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,156 posts
I am certain all Class/Racial combinations could solo to 60 without equiping any armor (just weapons if melee) or spending any Talent points.

If you wanted to make it "easy mode".. you could use drops and quest rewards.. cheater!
#5 Nov 18 2006 at 12:44 PM Rating: Decent
Felicite wrote:
I am certain all Class/Racial combinations could solo to 60 without equiping any armor (just weapons if melee) or spending any Talent points.

If you wanted to make it "easy mode".. you could use drops and quest rewards.. cheater!

Tell you what. Strip your lock nekkid, re-spec and don't spend points and try doing one of those level 59 quests. Before you give bad advise, you should try it.
#6 Nov 30 2006 at 1:51 PM Rating: Default
Well, I'm the only one I personally know who plays this game, and I don't relish trying to make friends 13 yr olds just to do instances...
#7 Nov 30 2006 at 1:57 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,634 posts
I know lots of people who play the game RL, and they are all older than me. Im 23. If that says anything. But i really dont associate with people under the age of 20. Does that count?

Back on topic, Yes you can solo the whole way to 60. Its a pretty fun game solo too, your second time around im sure you will want to group. It gets pretty dull the 2nd time and on...
#8 Nov 30 2006 at 2:17 PM Rating: Default
bgredsox wrote:
Well, I'm the only one I personally know who plays this game, and I don't relish trying to make friends 13 yr olds just to do instances...



gee...thank you for that generalization. I'm sure we are all happy that you come seeking the advice of those so far below you. I'm honored...anyone else?
#9 Nov 30 2006 at 5:12 PM Rating: Decent
I soloed my first character up to 60... now in beta up to 67 (Orc Hunter). Never bothered with parties and enjoy the company of my pet and I as we take down mobs.

I have 27 characters (not including the 6 I have on beta), all above lvl 30. I would say about 15 of those I enjoy soloing, the rest are in a static party ( 3 of them are with my wife and 2 of our friends we play every Friday night at their home for 6 to 10 hours) and the others my wife and I party ( well I do have 2 characters that I party with my grandsons when they are over).

So, yes. You can solo and it can be just as fun if you like to follow the storyline of WoW.
#10 Dec 01 2006 at 9:36 AM Rating: Decent
I just reached 60 with my warlock, primarily soloing, but even going solo you are bound to meet and interact with people. You might even find a few you like and may consider doing instances with. My suggestion is to solo, but not to rule instances and multiplayer quests out entirely.
#11 Dec 01 2006 at 10:07 AM Rating: Decent
I am very glad to hear this...I have an EQ account as well, and a level 63 character over there, but it is pretty much impossible to solo over there.

I play on an erratic basis. And I sometimes have a tendancy to jump on and off the game. I have a fairly high stress job, and generally dont feel like socializing when I go home, and so I dont enjoy groups as much. I just like to try and do quests, tradeskill, and kill some mobs.

I will group occasionally, but prefer to solo, and was hoping that I could continue to advance in this game primarily solo, as it gets frustrating and pointless if you cant get anywhere.

#12 Dec 01 2006 at 11:26 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,156 posts
ohmikeghod the Venerable wrote:
Felicite wrote:
I am certain all Class/Racial combinations could solo to 60 without equiping any armor (just weapons if melee) or spending any Talent points.

If you wanted to make it "easy mode".. you could use drops and quest rewards.. cheater!

Tell you what. Strip your lock nekkid, re-spec and don't spend points and try doing one of those level 59 quests. Before you give bad advise, you should try it.


Um.. I stand by my statement. I could kill equal level mobs using my Voidwalker and a few dots and some Shadowbolts.

Without gear or talents. The hell I couldn't.

I did not say it was smart or efficient.. I said it was *possible* to solo to 60.

Are you going refute that and say it's not possible?

Edit: Yeah, I said it was *possible*.. not smart. You don't think people could get naked characters of every race/class to 60 doing green quests and killing a million wolves in the forest? You think it's not POSSIBLE?

I was in no way suggesting or advising people to do that.

Edited, Dec 1st 2006 11:38am by Felicite
#13 Dec 01 2006 at 11:36 AM Rating: Good
****
7,466 posts
Felicite wrote:
ohmikeghod the Venerable wrote:
Felicite wrote:
I am certain all Class/Racial combinations could solo to 60 without equiping any armor (just weapons if melee) or spending any Talent points.

If you wanted to make it "easy mode".. you could use drops and quest rewards.. cheater!

Tell you what. Strip your lock nekkid, re-spec and don't spend points and try doing one of those level 59 quests. Before you give bad advise, you should try it.


Um.. I stand by my statement. I could kill equal level mobs using my Voidwalker and a few dots and some Shadowbolts.

Without gear or talents. The hell I couldn't.

I did not say it was smart or efficient.. I said it was *possible* to solo to 60.

Are you going refute that and say it's not possible?


No offense mike, but I agree with Felicite here... especially if you take on green mobs. I remember when some priests re-spec'd to not spending any points and healed MC raids just fine...

Is it possible to level solo naked (besides weapon for melee) without talents? Yes if done right. Will it be efficient or smart? Hell no
#14 Dec 01 2006 at 12:38 PM Rating: Good
**
304 posts
It's possible to solo naked and talentless, but 1) It'll be slow and 2) It's kinda dumb. lol

You'd be farming mobs of lower levels than you would be if you had decent gear and talents.
#15 Dec 01 2006 at 1:44 PM Rating: Good
***
3,801 posts
Tomec the Wise wrote:
Is it possible to level solo naked (besides weapon for melee) without talents? Yes if done right. Will it be efficient or smart? Hell no


Depends on class. If you have a warrior with just a weapon, and no armor, no shield, no talents, you will not be able to put out enough damage to kill a mob before it kills you with your basically 0 damage reduction.

No, not even a green mob.
#16 Dec 01 2006 at 3:31 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,156 posts
Ialaman wrote:
Depends on class. If you have a warrior with just a weapon, and no armor, no shield, no talents, you will not be able to put out enough damage to kill a mob before it kills you with your basically 0 damage reduction.

No, not even a green mob.

Wow.. Warriors suck. Maybe that's why mine is 16 and a cloth mule.

Ok. Look. I admit it. Perhaps my statement was a hyperbole.

But the seed of truth is there, too. WoW is super easy to solo.. and you don't need purplz or a perfect build.
#17 Dec 01 2006 at 3:54 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,233 posts
Depends really, If you have first aid leveled, (and you only fight one thing every 3 minutes) You can pop a fear when you get low and the monster will sit in front of you for 8 seconds while you first aid your HP back.

Essentially, that would allow you to stay alive long enough to kill a mob naked.

Just goofing off yesterday I aggroed about 15 defias dudes Greenskin and Van Cleef last night in the deamines naked. Sadly, I almost died but whirlwind saved my butt.

I'll go home tonight and try to solo a green naked, i'm fairly sure i could take out one of the Lv47 ogre mages with no problem.
#18 Dec 01 2006 at 4:07 PM Rating: Decent
Read this especially you bgredsox and lauisifer
http://wow.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=21;mid=1165018194292088903;page=1#1165018194292088903

Edited, Dec 1st 2006 7:11pm by milconfive
#19 Dec 01 2006 at 5:00 PM Rating: Decent
*
83 posts
To answer the OP yeah you can solo to 60 doesn't it say that in the FAQ somewhere, if not it should.

But hey lauisifer would you associate with me im only 19, but if you met me in RL you would think I was 27-28 b/c I seem older than I really am. Thats the reason why I can pull down the older ladies. They can't tell the difference as long as I go my fake on me so I can get into the bars.

I also agree with the people that say you could solo up to 60 w/o any talents spent or gear except weapons. It would just take FOREVER.

Edited, Dec 1st 2006 5:12pm by Tizzel
#20 Dec 02 2006 at 7:58 AM Rating: Decent
This guy can do it naked and solo.

http://forums.wow-europe.com/thread.html?topicId=17702127&sid=1

Edited, Dec 2nd 2006 11:02am by Rero
#21 Dec 03 2006 at 9:17 PM Rating: Decent
At level 28, the only interaction I've had w/ other players is people 8 levels lower than me asking me to join a group. (100% rejection, so far)

I think this is a pretty intersesting game, as all the other RPG-type games I've played have forced you into party mechanics. There hasn't been a game I've played where I could "go it alone". I'm not trying to be a mogul in the game, just trying work my way to 60 (now 70, I guess) by myself. I will, of course, use the AH, which, I guess, is some sort of interaction with other people. That I think is neat.

Also, I think it would be neat to be in a part with a couple of other live people, but since I don't personally know anyone who is playing the game, I'm hesitant to join up with other people.
#22 Dec 03 2006 at 9:54 PM Rating: Good
****
7,466 posts
bgredsox wrote:
At level 28, the only interaction I've had w/ other players is people 8 levels lower than me asking me to join a group. (100% rejection, so far)

I think this is a pretty intersesting game, as all the other RPG-type games I've played have forced you into party mechanics. There hasn't been a game I've played where I could "go it alone". I'm not trying to be a mogul in the game, just trying work my way to 60 (now 70, I guess) by myself. I will, of course, use the AH, which, I guess, is some sort of interaction with other people. That I think is neat.

Also, I think it would be neat to be in a part with a couple of other live people, but since I don't personally know anyone who is playing the game, I'm hesitant to join up with other people.


Right there is a prime example of one of the downsides to wow imo... the fact that you can solo 1-60. While it is nice to not be forced into a group, it hurts the game a little imo because people don't learn their roles in a group and don't make friends that easily... you said it yourself, you're hesitant to join up with other people in the game. No offense to you, but you're turning a MMORPG into an RPG while being in a chatroom where you can get items ingame if you want. I'd go play like FFXII or something if I wanted to solo all day long, plus it would be free. Paying 15 bucks a month to play a solo game... Of course, at the same time, a game which forces you to party (ala ffxi) is just as bad in a sense. While it gets people to make friends and learn roles in parties, it hurts people who picked a job they liked the look of, but isn't wanted in parties (DRG anyone? BST?) or aren't wanted in the way the job was "designed" (SMN with being healer rather then using avatars most times)

I personally think that there is a good balance between the two in EQ2, however once I had to quit due to money, it kind of lost my interest some and I couldn't really pick it up again... don't really know what it was, because I was having fun while I was playing, but then I had to quit due to money like I said, and it basically went downhill when I compared WoW and it in my mind, and it no longer had a real draw to it anymore. Maybe part of it was that I hadn't been raiding much (or even at the level cap, which is nice that you can raid at various levels not just cap, and I mean raid raids, not like the 10-manable instances in WoW) and had been having some trouble with a couple things I was doing in it because everyone I was friends with couldn't/wouldn't do it due to rep issues. I wouldn't mind going back and checking it out a little more later though, and the new race may have lessened that problem I was having... but, by the time I checked it out again it'd be right back the way it was, as I barely have time for anything but WoW atm.

Edited, Dec 3rd 2006 10:00pm by Tomec
#23 Dec 04 2006 at 10:43 AM Rating: Decent
*
64 posts
Coincidentally, my main is a 60 shaman and a troll.

He leveled mostly through solo questing, with a little BG, and a (very) few instances towards the end.

It's not at all impossible. There are some quests you can't do (mostly the dungeon and elite ones), but it's really not a problem. I ran out of quests I could do a few times, but never had to grind more than just part of a level every now and then.

PUG's can be so horrible that I can't blame anyone for avoiding them.

Questing or doing instances with pals/guildies is fun, though, and I've enjoyed it a lot with my alts.
#24 Dec 04 2006 at 11:07 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,634 posts
Quote:
Read this especially you bgredsox and lauisifer
http://wow.allakhazam.com/forum.html...94292088903


Read -
Quote:
Ok, whats so wrong about being a teenager and playing this game


Absolutely nothing, I didnt say there was anything wrong, I just dont associate with people younger than 20 per choice. I dont care if you are a genius, I just dont have the heart too. ** Note this is why i dont have kids.

Do yourself the favor and not take it personal. For a female to say at age 23 they dont want kids or to deal with kids is a rare bird. I guess im just different than most. And like i said, I dont care if your a genius, or do smart things, then dont tell me that your only 13, and do your role in group playing. Im cool with not knowing. Happens all the time im sure.
#25 Dec 04 2006 at 12:05 PM Rating: Decent
I, myself plan to solo to 60 (currently have a lvl 38 hunter)and beyond. Why, you ask?
1. Cause I like the challenge I have by TRUELY playing my class and not someone else's opinion on what my role should be.

2. MMORPG does not mean you HAVE to group, the G does not stand for grouping.

3. Just because I am not grouping or in a guild does not mean I am not socializing (DUH!). Ever hear of PvP? Thats why I play a MMORPG and plan on soloing my merry little heart out ;-)

4. I have a hard time making a friend/having a relationship or 'socializing' with a cartoon image. Geez, folks! I reserve these events with for RL folks that I meet and talk with NOT cartoon images!

5. Why is it I am seeing all of the posts from teens and pre-teens saying that they act older then what they are and have yet to see a post where someone said that they with a really mature minor last night and WOW was it fun!

My opinion is play the game you feel comfortable with.



Edited, Dec 4th 2006 3:18pm by Trailtripper

Edited, Dec 4th 2006 3:19pm by Trailtripper
#26 Dec 04 2006 at 12:19 PM Rating: Good
**
976 posts
Tomec the Wise wrote:

Right there is a prime example of one of the downsides to wow imo... the fact that you can solo 1-60. While it is nice to not be forced into a group, it hurts the game a little imo because people don't learn their roles in a group and don't make friends that easily... you said it yourself, you're hesitant to join up with other people in the game. No offense to you, but you're turning a MMORPG into an RPG while being in a chatroom where you can get items ingame if you want. I'd go play like FFXII or something if I wanted to solo all day long, plus it would be free.


So what if he doesn't learn his role in a group? He obviously doesn't plan on grouping, and if he does change his mind, THEN he'll learn how to function in a group. I mostly solo in WoW, only partying for elite quests and the instanced dungeons. Some of my alts only solo. I really don't use my guilds for anything other than idle chat during travel or downtime. I submit the occasional goodie to the guild bank and take one out every so often, but otherwise...

WoW is so much more different than FFXII. FFXII is good for an MMORPG-styled offline game, but it lacks an auction house and the open-endedness of WoW. Simply put, WoW is not only a great MMORPG but also a great RPG. Playing the game for its solo gameplay, storyline, exploration ability, and freedom is just as valid a reason for playing it as is playing it because you want to pee vee pee or raid dungeons with 39 strangers. Though I would advise people to NOT be totally paranoid and dismissing of other characters, they shouldn't be castigated for wanting to solo to 60.

I hate committing to a game. That's why I never raided or PVP'd (though I may start trying both out when BC comes out, now that they're more manageable affairs) and I only barely managed to grit my teeth through the pre-raid dungeons once or twice before giving up on those too. Instances are fun, yes, and scripted story sequences are great...but I just hate the endless trash-killing death-causing crap that I have to slog through for three to five hours at once. May you burn forever, Uldaman and Mauradon.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 47 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (47)