Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

WartardsFollow

#1 Jul 24 2007 at 1:26 PM Rating: Good
***
2,215 posts
I know people love to rag on hunters, calling them huntards and whatnot, but I've had way more experience with crappy warriors. Maybe it's because my main is a 70 warrior so I know what warriors should and shouldn't be doing, but some people just shock me with their ineptitude.

For instance, the inevitably failed Black Morass run that had an arms / fury warrior dpsing in tank gear and not even matching me (the tank) for dps.

Or a great one, last night I run Steamvaults. The leader invites his friend in, who is a fury warrior. If I'd have known this from the start, I wouldn't have joined his party. So, we start working on the first few pulls. Small numbers of mobs, easily overcome. I notice the warrior pulling aggro occasionally, I just decide to work that much harder. Then the big pulls start coming. We had no CC outside of sap, so the rogue would sap and then I would pull and we would pray for the best. Our enormous melee dps coupled with the survivability of the melee dpsers made it so that even though the pulls could be sloppy, we'd all make it. Except for the fury warrior. He didn't understand that you attack the target the tank is attacking. He would just pick one and then usually get beat down into the dirt.

That wasn't the worst, though. He liked to charge. I would shoot a mob, as the mob was running to me he would charge it. And then thunder clap. And then die almost immediately. For instance, we all needed rep. So we decided to kill the slaves, as they are yellow so they pull one at a time and are easy to kill. One guy gets bored, goes gets a drink. Right after, I pull one of the slaves. About halfway to me, the warrior charges it. Right next to the slave master guys that force the yellow slaves to aggro. Which causes every mob in the room to aggro him and kill him in less time than it took for him to type "WTF". I would've laughed if those mobs hadn't killed every person in our party, including the AFKer, immediately afterwards.

It should be noted that I inspected his gear before the run, and he was decked out in green quest rewards. Hardly a blue in sight. If he had been my friend, I would've taken the time to explain him his class before inviting him into an instance run. I tried to be polite to him, but it was a struggle.
____________________________
Realm - Mug'thol
Hierax - Level 80 Orc Warrior
Ganoes - Level 80 Blood Elf Paladin
Oreb - Level 80 Tauren Druid
Aguirre - Level 80 Troll Hunter
Shurq - Level 70 Undead Rogue
#2 Jul 24 2007 at 3:18 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
*
179 posts
True. My warrior is my main (so I'm rarely in a group with another Warrior) but with my Pally...I've began to notice it.

Fact is, there are some dumb warriors. It's sad to admit, but it's unfortunately true.

So please, if you can read this and you have a warrior, do try hard not to suck. It's unfortunate that a lot rides on us to keep the group alive. And when one of us fails, we all get blamed (warriors I mean) in the end.
#3 Jul 24 2007 at 6:28 PM Rating: Default
lol i think the warrior you was with lorimath had a brother on my server lower lvl i was on my lvl 26 warr in WC (dont ask i was bored need the 20+ to get exp), when they had another warr i mean i am arms with 5 in fury for crit but i have tank gear cause i was prot so all sta i can get with out haveing a lvl 70 it was clear i was tanking due to lvl of me and mobs other warr was lvl 20 or so i think but he would charge mobs on my pull all the time no big deal since he wasnt under mobs lvl really but if he keeps it up he will get owned one of these days like the guy you was grouped with. i dont know i guess some peeps dont think or maybe just mad they aint tanking and want to. sorta like the lvl 30 mage in rfk i was 26 we would get like 6 mobs cause mage would pull no sheep rouge ddint get to sap and mage would aoe before i could even get 2 sunders i would tc to start to get some aggro but while i was doing that mage was casting blizzard and running like a mad man needless to say we ended up dieing after about 6 min in there.
#4 Jul 24 2007 at 6:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
****
4,297 posts
i would like to nominate a warrforumtard.
____________________________
hvergelmir, make sure your sarcasmometer is properly calibrated.
#5 Jul 24 2007 at 6:59 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
2,717 posts
Who would that be, Axhead?

Lol, my worst wartard was the guy tanking Uld in battle stance with S&S, who never used TC or sunder armor (and obviously not revenge or taunt). "Why don't you use sunder armor?"
"Cuz I'm not in def stance" (Hadnt played a war in a while forgot sunder was available in all stances, but bear with me)
"Why aren't you in d stance?"
"Cuz it sucks"
So I'm sitting here on my pally, healing 4 targets every fight, and wiping on trash. So I leave. "Why'd you leave?" "Cuz you can't hold aggro" "It's cuz you dont know how to heal." ergggg....
____________________________
comma long-slash comma comma open-parenthesis asterick underscore asterick close-parenthesis comma comma long-slash comma
#6 Jul 24 2007 at 7:54 PM Rating: Good
***
1,331 posts
Hunters can outdps ill geared wars.

Huntards is just a phrase that goes around because alot of hunters are just botters or farmers, and it flows with speach/typing.

I don't know why you would not group with a fury war for steamvaults, they dish out some good dps. Are you talking about HEROIC steamvaults? Because in my fury gear I can tank it in berserker's stance, on normal.

Attack the player, not the class.

Players make bad choices, classes alone can not make poor decisions.

Word of advice, in the future; DPS follows the commands of the leader. If a dps war joins group, and they **** it up, repeatedly. Ask your leader to drop them, and find another dpser. As you should do for ANY dpser. Not just warriors.
____________________________
Selector Warrior 80
Selected Death Knight 80
#7 Jul 24 2007 at 8:07 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,215 posts
devioususer wrote:
Hunters can outdps ill geared wars.

Huntards is just a phrase that goes around because alot of hunters are just botters or farmers, and it flows with speach/typing.


That's now what huntard comes from. Huntard comes from those relentless nubs that need on everything and make constant mistakes leading to inevitable and frequent wipes.

Quote:

I don't know why you would not group with a fury war for steamvaults, they dish out some good dps. Are you talking about HEROIC steamvaults? Because in my fury gear I can tank it in berserker's stance, on normal.


I'm talking regular Steamvaults, which cannot be tanked in fury gear nonspecced in Berserker stance, no matter how good you are. So don't lie. I generally tend to avoid DPS warriors in my group because they bring no CC and most DPS warriors that run instances, from my experience, just aren't that good. And there's the whole competing for loot thing which can sour my mood.

Quote:

Attack the player, not the class.


Which is what I did...

Quote:

Players make bad choices, classes alone can not make poor decisions.


Agreed.

Quote:

Word of advice, in the future; DPS follows the commands of the leader. If a dps war joins group, and they @#%^ it up, repeatedly. Ask your leader to drop them, and find another dpser. As you should do for ANY dpser. Not just warriors.


The whole thing is this DPS warrior was brought in because he was a friend of the party leaders.

Besides, this thread is just to make fun of crappy warriors others have played with. Since we all (hopefully) play warriors, we have a damn good idea of what seperates the best from the rest.
____________________________
Realm - Mug'thol
Hierax - Level 80 Orc Warrior
Ganoes - Level 80 Blood Elf Paladin
Oreb - Level 80 Tauren Druid
Aguirre - Level 80 Troll Hunter
Shurq - Level 70 Undead Rogue
#8 Jul 25 2007 at 9:26 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
*****
10,572 posts
Quote:
Because in my fury gear I can tank it in berserker's stance, on normal.


Not even a chance.

1) Bezerker stance makes you take way more damage, thus needing more heals, thus causing more healer aggro

1B) fury gear doesn't have as much damage mitigation leading to more of the #1 problem

2) Bezerker stance/fury gear (assuming a fury spec then) means you have nothing for threat generation, which means you won't hold aggro through the heals.

Now if you're wearing raid epics, then this might not be the case. But if you're geared from only quests and regular instances, then you will not be able to tank the 70+ instances in beserker stance with fury gear. sorry.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#9 Jul 25 2007 at 10:17 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
188 posts
That's ironic, because i recently tanked SV in berserker stance as fury. You just need a good healer. I was in my Glad gear so i had a bit of stam and resillience as well. So yes, it is possible.
____________________________
Azuremyst
************************************************
Mechblazin lvl 42 Human Mage
Mechhunter Lvl 40 Hunter

Lightbringer
********************************************
Cruality Lvl 63 dwarf priest
Mechwarrior lvl 70 NE warrior
Mechsneaky Lvl 57 Ne Rogue
MechBlazer lvl 29 gnome warlock
Shokc lvl 15 Orc Shaman
Meh..some other crap i don't really feel like thinking about =)
#10 Jul 25 2007 at 10:36 AM Rating: Good
Guru
**
433 posts
I largely doubt anyone has tanked SV in berzerker stance unless the DPS was really really slow. Hitting through heals isn't a problem. Although tanking without a shield is throwing away mana (and time, if you wipe). I've tanked many instances in fury gear, but it was in defensive stance.

Now, the main reason to me doubting you can tank SV in berzerker stance: The threat reduction. Berzerker stance is a static threat reducer of 20%. Meaning you'll have to out-DPS every single party member with 20% ('cept the healer, but that's not a problem, expecially not if pally). In a usual instance the tank carries around 10-15% of the DPS, leaving the rest of the 85-90% to the left over 3 members. That's roughly 25-30% each. So, as a berzerker tank you'll need to be pulling 40% (leaving the rest of the members 20% each) and even that's cutting it. You'd probably have to pull a strong 45% of the DPS throughout the instance to be sure you don't let a mob slip on any of the pulls.

All in all I doubt you can tank any instance in berzerker stance unless you greatly out-gear the other party members, and even then it's very doubtful. Tanking an instance in battle stance is another matter, however. This is very possible with a 2h:ing warrior.
____________________________
My useful (?) posts
#11 Jul 25 2007 at 12:05 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
****
4,297 posts
well both battle and berserker stance have the 80% threat modifier, and def stance has a 130% modifier.

it's the extra 10% damage taken in zerker that would make tanking a little ridiculous.
____________________________
hvergelmir, make sure your sarcasmometer is properly calibrated.
#12 Jul 25 2007 at 12:50 PM Rating: Good
Guru
**
433 posts
Oh really? I thought it was Berzerker: 80%, Battle: 100% and Defensive: 130%... Thanks for elightening me though :)
____________________________
My useful (?) posts
#13 Jul 25 2007 at 12:58 PM Rating: Good
***
2,101 posts
axhed wrote:
well both battle and berserker stance have the 80% threat modifier, and def stance has a 130% modifier.


Really? Hmm I did not know that. I thought battle was a neutral stance, no buffs no debuffs, completely neutral, Zerk stance buffs damage output and debuffs damage reduction and threat generated, and Defensive was the polar oposite of Zerk, buff threat and damage reduction and debuffs damage output.

#14 Jul 25 2007 at 1:01 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,717 posts
Well, the rogues will end up doing 79% threat as well, and they can feint, and need 110% (not 100%) threat to take aggro. Ranged classes need 130% threat to take aggro. Which means, assuming you hold aggro, you need to do 92% of the rogues DPS or 76% of the ranged DPS (before threat modifiers are factored in). If you're specced and geared for DPS, you could theoretically pull this off, assuming you can get one mob per pull.

However, if you have 2 mobs, you need to 62.5% of the DPS to the off-target than the damage you are taking from both targets in order to keep him off the healer. In addition to doing 92% of the rogues DPS to keep the main target on you. If you assume the 2 are about the same, that's 154.5% DPS...it keeps expanding as you get more targets.
____________________________
comma long-slash comma comma open-parenthesis asterick underscore asterick close-parenthesis comma comma long-slash comma
#15 Jul 25 2007 at 2:30 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,090 posts
Probably my worst experience with having a second warrior in the group was Pre-BC in a Scholo run, I was DPSing, other warrior was trying to tank it in Battle stance.
It was after that run that my and my mate found out that their guild was full of nubs and decided against merging guilds with them
____________________________
Ruinator - 50 Eth Warrior - Dayblind
Mazzaki - 50 Eth Mage - Dayblind
Therthamar - 24 Eth Cleric - Dayblind
Laerune - 23 Eth Rogue - Dayblind
#16 Jul 25 2007 at 6:22 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
*
188 posts
l33t healer, spam cleave.
____________________________
Azuremyst
************************************************
Mechblazin lvl 42 Human Mage
Mechhunter Lvl 40 Hunter

Lightbringer
********************************************
Cruality Lvl 63 dwarf priest
Mechwarrior lvl 70 NE warrior
Mechsneaky Lvl 57 Ne Rogue
MechBlazer lvl 29 gnome warlock
Shokc lvl 15 Orc Shaman
Meh..some other crap i don't really feel like thinking about =)
#17 Jul 25 2007 at 6:52 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,331 posts
Bah, KTM ftw.

It IS possible to tank in berserker stance.

With increased damage = more threat (more rage). the extra 3% crit is nice too.
____________________________
Selector Warrior 80
Selected Death Knight 80
#18 Jul 25 2007 at 7:46 PM Rating: Decent
**
277 posts
It's possible, but always best to tank in defensive - taunt and revenge have a purpose.

I've rarely seen warriors who are completely idiotic in instances, although I've seen quite a few who were under-equipped. Most of the time I'm main-tank, and it's fairly easy in defensive to hold complete aggro on 4-5 mobs - you just have to constantly switch targets (back and forth) to lay out taunts and sunders on the off-targeted mobs. I don't see how this would be possible in zerk without crazy dps. Maybe someone could show me their dps weap sets for zerk-tanking?
____________________________
Ovelia // 70 Human Warlock
Roylle // 68 Human Warrior
Zephyris // 44 NE Priest
#19 Jul 26 2007 at 4:03 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
**
362 posts
Quote:
I largely doubt anyone has tanked SV in berzerker stance unless the DPS was really really slow.


I did twice!! But its truth that DPS was slow and that I tanked like that only last boss.
I was in group with healing palla, hunter, ice mage and healing druid.
We made it to last boss but DPS was to slow to destroy tanks so we wiped twice.
Damage done by mage was puny and hunter although a good one couldn't just do it alone. In fact I did pretty much same damage as mage while tanking....

I switched to DPS gear and we killed boss first try.

I also tanked SL in DPS gear twice. All but last boss where I switched to tanking gear.

Those situations are fun and you remember it for long time but it so rare to be able to it.

Talking about threat multipliers. Believe me SS + WW is more threat at start then anything tank can do... You just need to be overgeared for that instance or have 2 very competent healers.

Quote:
Tanking an instance in battle stance is another matter, however. This is very possible with a 2h:ing warrior.


Actualy it is harder, unless you use TC a lot but i wouldn't call it DPS tanking, rather hybrid tanking...
WW is your friend on multiply pulls and crit helps a lot, even additional damage taken which gives you unlimited rage (unless you are dead of course).
#20 Jul 26 2007 at 9:06 AM Rating: Good
Guru
**
433 posts
On the other hand: Battle stance = req. for SS. And berzerker is only +10% more dmg taken. So I'd say SS + Cleave > berzerker stance for tanking (if you must choose... I'd rather just tank in def. stance /shrugg). Also, I seem to have read somewhere that Cleave gives the same threat to the constant on the ability that HS does. Which makes it even better for tanking (if that's true).

Edit: SS being the abbreviation for Sweeping Strikes in this case.

Edit: Krisss effectivly assuming that I meant arms warrior with 2h warrior, and me assuming so as well later on, since I rarely remember anything I post.

Edited, Jul 26th 2007 7:41pm by Xordon
____________________________
My useful (?) posts
#21 Jul 26 2007 at 9:32 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
632 posts
shield slam can be done in any form i believe...
____________________________
I ALSO OFFER YOU THE PERFECT SOLUTION TO ALL OF OUR WARRIOR PROBLEMS. SEEING AS WARRIORS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE THE BEST SCALING CLASS, I THINK WARRIORS SHOULD SCALE WITH THE USER! THE MROE FRUSTRATED AND PISSED OFF WE GET, THE MORE RED BAR WE HAVE! FROST NOVA? HA! I'LL JUST PEE ON MY FOOT AND THAW THAT OUT!

-- Vindictus
#22 Jul 26 2007 at 9:38 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,717 posts
He meant sweeping strikes, not shield slam. Which is an arms talent, not a fury talent.
____________________________
comma long-slash comma comma open-parenthesis asterick underscore asterick close-parenthesis comma comma long-slash comma
#23 Jul 29 2007 at 7:05 PM Rating: Excellent
**
250 posts
I'd have to say my experience has been quite the opposite of the OP. Are there poorly played Warriors out there? Sure. Have I suffered because of them? Nope. Huntards though.. ooooo I get so miffed!

I would instead propose the term "Worriers" since usually my encounters with an under-skilled Warrior resulted in them worrying about every detail except tanking.

In that case, I just let them DpS and make my pet keep the aggro. /whisper Priest, "Just heal my pet, the Worrier will probably think everything is running accordingly."

EditNotes: Just for you skribby poo I'm going to add some footnotes here.

In high level content the only PuG I'll do is quests. Mostly I am referring to low level instances since most poorly played high level warriors I've seen know they suck, admit they suck, and warn you that they suck. No harm no foul.

Obviously my pet isn't going to be tanking a Heroic let alone a 70's instance. I've said it to other posters around these boards, I'll say it again; learn to read between the lines mate. I never said we don't reprimand the idiots, we just ensure the mechanics of our operation are secure before we light their *** on fire. Koscher?

At any rate, a hunter misbehaving is much more costly to a group than a warrior removed from their role as tank and cast to the side as DpS. You see Skribby poo, my time is valuable. I often don't have time to just kick a Warrior and wait for another (but it briefs well). The exchange of tank to DpS is fair enough. However, with a Huntard, you either have a DpS / CC or you don't. In the event that they can't handle their group role, it becomes quite costly since what the heck else are they going to do? /boot!

Doggone Worriers man.. quit worrying so much and git'r done! Smiley: lol


Edited, Jul 30th 2007 4:50pm by Bordagar
#24 Jul 30 2007 at 7:28 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
2,717 posts
Quote:
I'd have to say my experience has been quite the opposite of the OP. Are there poorly played Warriors out there? Sure. Have I suffered because of them? Nope. Huntards though.. ooooo I get so miffed!

I would instead propose the term "Worriers" since usually my encounters with an under-skilled Warrior resulted in them worrying about every detail except tanking.

In that case, I just let them DpS and make my pet keep the aggro. /whisper Priest, "Just heal my pet, the Worrier will probably think everything is running accordingly."


...which hurts the group and makes it so the warrior will never learn to play right. It hurts the group because if he still thinks he's the tank, he'll be DPSing in defensive with a S&S out (unless he's DPS tanking, which means he's hopeless anyway). And, if nobody corrects him but everyone makes up for him, later on he won't learn anyway.

Kicking a wartard or getting mad at him is slightly better, because even if he gets defensive and says "I'm right I'm right", if enough people complain he'll eventually say "maybe I should try it their way" and when it works he'll be better for it. Yeah it might **** him off, but later on if you end up grouping with him again, you might be glad he's learned.
____________________________
comma long-slash comma comma open-parenthesis asterick underscore asterick close-parenthesis comma comma long-slash comma
#25 Jul 30 2007 at 5:45 PM Rating: Default
***
2,215 posts
Bordagar wrote:
I'd have to say my experience has been quite the opposite of the OP. Are there poorly played Warriors out there? Sure. Have I suffered because of them? Nope. Huntards though.. ooooo I get so miffed!

I would instead propose the term "Worriers" since usually my encounters with an under-skilled Warrior resulted in them worrying about every detail except tanking.

In that case, I just let them DpS and make my pet keep the aggro. /whisper Priest, "Just heal my pet, the Worrier will probably think everything is running accordingly."

EditNotes: Just for you skribby poo I'm going to add some footnotes here.

In high level content the only PuG I'll do is quests. Mostly I am referring to low level instances since most poorly played high level warriors I've seen know they suck, admit they suck, and warn you that they suck. No harm no foul.

Obviously my pet isn't going to be tanking a Heroic let alone a 70's instance. I've said it to other posters around these boards, I'll say it again; learn to read between the lines mate. I never said we don't reprimand the idiots, we just ensure the mechanics of our operation are secure before we light their *** on fire. Koscher?

At any rate, a hunter misbehaving is much more costly to a group than a warrior removed from their role as tank and cast to the side as DpS. You see Skribby poo, my time is valuable. I often don't have time to just kick a Warrior and wait for another (but it briefs well). The exchange of tank to DpS is fair enough. However, with a Huntard, you either have a DpS / CC or you don't. In the event that they can't handle their group role, it becomes quite costly since what the heck else are they going to do? /boot!

Doggone Worriers man.. quit worrying so much and git'r done! Smiley: lol


Edited, Jul 30th 2007 4:50pm by Bordagar


Dude, the Black Morass run I mentioned in my initial post was wrecked by the warrior in my party. I inspected his gear, and besides his weapons, he was in tank gear... but I was the tank, he was DPS. We did such terrible DPS that there were over 3 portals open at once. You ever see that many portals open? It means you've lost. Before the first boss. I have never had such a pitiful run, huntard or otherwise.
____________________________
Realm - Mug'thol
Hierax - Level 80 Orc Warrior
Ganoes - Level 80 Blood Elf Paladin
Oreb - Level 80 Tauren Druid
Aguirre - Level 80 Troll Hunter
Shurq - Level 70 Undead Rogue
#26 Jul 30 2007 at 6:22 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,717 posts
All right, regardless of what happens, if he sucks but you make him think he doesn't, he wont know he sucks. So he gets to higher levels and plays like he did, but he loses. Your approach is to come in, let the pet tank, and let the healer heal your pet, without saying anything to him. You also said he'd think it was running normal. So regardless of whether you meant level 20 or level 70, it's the same thing.

And I've wiped on VC due to lack of DPS before, the tank and healer were more than competent, but since we'd lost 2 DPSers there just wasn't enough until we tried again with a better strategy. So if you have the warrior DPSing in defensive with a shield, he aint gonna do much, and that will hurt your group. It may not cause a wipe, but it will take longer, and your time is, how you say? Valuable?
____________________________
comma long-slash comma comma open-parenthesis asterick underscore asterick close-parenthesis comma comma long-slash comma
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 0 All times are in CDT