Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

Reinstated Post by DarqflameFollow

#27 Feb 10 2009 at 6:18 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
**
917 posts
Tavarde wrote:

Generally though we firmly believe the GM and his Officers are the hardest workers in the raid. It shows every day in the things we do. Why shouldn't we get some sort of advantage at gear?


Your stupid system is stupid. So you mean that every member who works hard up to your standards gets to become an officer? But you wont have too many officers cause that will spoil your chances are loot. You talk about the other guildies“ selfishness but it is clear that in fact your guild“s leadership is at least in the same degree bent on getting loot.
#28 Feb 10 2009 at 6:37 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
306 posts
Wow, I would /Gquit on the spot..... That system is HORRIBLE!!

I would suggest a loot council or something of that nature, but it is obvious that the GM and officers involved would ***** that up as well. Sounds like you guys need to have a serious (no rank structure) guild talk.
#29 Feb 10 2009 at 7:13 AM Rating: Excellent
**
961 posts
This is why I enjoy casual, laid-back guilds who don't hardcore raid... We just all /roll on it if we need it and we like and respect each other enough to let someone else have it if they really need it. There is no really fair way, besides random rolling, and still then people are bad at rolls. Way too much drama in raiding for me. Been there, done that, been on the losing side of guild favoritism, even been a guest on raids before and won items and been hated by people for it and never invited back because the losers were angry. In some ways it's easier to raid casually since you're almost forced to do random rolls.
____________________________
Indomitable?
Not to be subdued; untamable; invincible; as, an indomitable will, courage.
#30 Feb 10 2009 at 7:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,020 posts
Insta /gquit. No question about it.

You DO realize that the logic you are using is the logic that fuels 95% of Dictatorships around the world, no? "I work so hard and make the country go forward, so I can take whatever I want while the people building my 5th palace can starve."

It is SUCH bull, it is ridiculous.

As a leader, you SHOULD feel entitled to more. As a GOOD leader, you should PASS UP the opportunity to take it.


Have you SERIOUSLY thought about the system you chose?

Your GL (and, I presume, his alts) all get a 50 point weight. If he rolls above a 50, he AUTOMATICALLY gets the item. Even if he rolls a 25, the opposing player has to get a 76 to beat him.

It is RIDICULOUS. He will get over 50% of the items he rolls for. It gets SLIGHTLY less ridiculous as it goes down the line, but seriously.

If your basic logic skills are that bad, just go DKP.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#31 Feb 10 2009 at 7:30 AM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
**
917 posts
Tavarde wrote:
some of our raiders were inclined to horde their karma, passing up on reasonable upgrades in hopes of getting that one incredible drop later down the line. This of course does not help the raid as a whole. All upgrades she be rolled on by everyone who can use them.


How dare some people even think they have a right to decide themselves what gear they should roll on or not, how to spend their own raid points?!! The nerve of these people!!
#32 Feb 10 2009 at 7:58 AM Rating: Excellent
Tavarde wrote:
They all knew it was coming. Last week we opened the discussion up to the entire guild in vent and the debate went nowhere. Too many people with too many varying opinions all based around their own selfish, unspoken needs. The discussion went round and round for over an hour. We opted to settle it among the guild's leadership in private and see where the chips fall.

If you feel the system is stupid that's fine, I won't hold it against you. To each his own. We debated in the 2nd discussion about Loot Council and it almost went through. I proposed Loot Council with a basis in Recount information but that ultimately would have proven a far less than perfect system. We were split 3 and 3 between general Loot Council and the Weight system for a little while but we eventually agreed upon the Weight system. If it sucks and people start gquitting by the dozen we would absolutely reverse the decision but we have to wait and see how it works out in the next window of raiding.

Generally though we firmly believe the GM and his Officers are the hardest workers in the raid. It shows every day in the things we do. Why shouldn't we get some sort of advantage at gear?


That is totally retarded. Talk about selfish needs... I really hope your stronger raiders leave you and your high and mighty officers high and dry and head for another guild. You're an officer, doesn't make you the better player.
#33 Feb 10 2009 at 8:03 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,558 posts
I hereby humbly apologise to rusttle and potsoriginal for all the many rate-downs and negative comments they've received within some of their more memorable threads here. Because their ideas are glittering goldmines of genius compared to the loot system your guild has just dreamed up.
____________________________
Rorschach wrote:
For my own part, regret nothing. Have lived life, free from compromise ... and step into the shadow now without complaint.

#34 Feb 10 2009 at 8:12 AM Rating: Excellent
I've got an idea, how about each player start with 50+ to their roll. Each time someone breaks a trap/ pulls aggro stupidly/ignores omen and pulls the aggro off the MA or so on they lose say 2 points. At the end of the raid they number they have left gets added to their roll. Now it's fair. It's based on NOT BEING A NUB and allows those with skills even if they are part time to excel and get better gear.

Edited, Feb 10th 2009 10:13am by Katielynn
#35 Feb 10 2009 at 8:13 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
*
184 posts
This is the 33 subjective post saying that loot system is not only bad, but inherently unfair and counter-productive for a raiding guild.

In my opinion a normal raid consists of 3 groups,

1. Good raiders 10-15

2. Decent raiders 10-15 (these will rarely add up to 25)

3. New raiders and bads 5-10.

Most wrath content can be done with 20 folks, but later content should require a system that all 3 types can live with or you will never get 25 peeps into a raid group.

Not one single post agreeing with you and your loot system designed to gear up you and your buds. Congress and pay raises comes to mind.

Your guild will fall apart under this system, probably alt posts on your realm forum already. GM and officers will have reps as loot whores.

I give you 2 weeks until your guild falls apart and you and your boys transfer servers.
#36 Feb 10 2009 at 8:42 AM Rating: Excellent
Citizen's Arrest!
Avatar
******
29,465 posts
The Smallsword of Doom wrote:
Because their ideas are glittering goldmines of genius compared to the loot system your guild has just dreamed up.


To be honest, I've left things in the toilet that were glittering goldmines of genius compared to the loot system in the OP.
#37 Feb 10 2009 at 9:07 AM Rating: Excellent
*
80 posts
Quote:
All upgrades she be rolled on by everyone who can use them.


Nonsense. My employer doesn't tell me how to spend the money I earn "for the good of the company," it is my money.

Quote:
One in particular that shocked me was a rogue who, after being handed the best DPS leather chest item in the game Saturday night (the lv 226 item off heroic Malygos), logged off in anger before because she suddenly was supposedly being given less of a chance at gear than before.


She realized what a sham your new system is. You should pay more attention to what your guildies are telling you in words and deeds.

Quote:
They all knew it was coming. Last week we opened the discussion up to the entire guild in vent and the debate went nowhere. Too many people with too many varying opinions all based around their own selfish, unspoken needs.


"They all knew it was coming" is you rationalizing the decision, it doesn't justify it. It's like saying "she had it coming, being dressed like that" and let me say that I think you're performing the same act on your guild members that is usually rationalized in the same way.

The fact that so many people have their own opinions should indicate to you that your system is controversial and people aren't happy with it. Just because people disagree with you doesn't mean they are selfish with "unspoken needs." It sounds to me like they were telling you their needs up front but you aren't listening.

Quote:
I proposed Loot Council with a basis in Recount information but that ultimately would have proven a far less than perfect system.


Also an incredibly bad idea. Explain to the Disc healers why they aren't being rewarded, and yet all the DPS meter toppers are?

Quote:
If it sucks and people start gquitting by the dozen we would absolutely reverse the decision but we have to wait and see how it works out in the next window of raiding.


It's apparent you have no idea of the magnitude of what you've done. When word gets out on the server about your guild's loot policy you won't be able to get new members, and only someone very naive would come back to it once they leave -- why trust you a second time when people had to quit "by the dozen" for you to listen to reason?

Quote:
Generally though we firmly believe the GM and his Officers are the hardest workers in the raid. It shows every day in the things we do. Why shouldn't we get some sort of advantage at gear?


True leaders aren't in it because of the potential for self gain, they do it because they enjoy helping others succeed. Your guild members pay $15/month just like you, and there are many guilds where people can go instead of yours.

It doesn't sound like you are doing that much to help your guildies move forward except to serve as another rung on the ladder you are climbing to gear nirvana.
#38 Feb 10 2009 at 9:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Equal Opportunity Hater
*****
19,369 posts
Good leaders are willing to set themselves on equal ground with their followers. Your leaders are not good.
#39 Feb 10 2009 at 9:23 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,558 posts
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
The Smallsword of Doom wrote:
Because their ideas are glittering goldmines of genius compared to the loot system your guild has just dreamed up.


To be honest, I've left things in the toilet that were glittering goldmines of genius compared to the loot system in the OP.

I know. I've been following you around and collecting souvenirs.
____________________________
Rorschach wrote:
For my own part, regret nothing. Have lived life, free from compromise ... and step into the shadow now without complaint.

#40 Feb 10 2009 at 10:16 AM Rating: Good
*****
11,576 posts
It would be one thing if we were discussing how a fair loot system was met with whining, /gquits, and general discontent. It's just a shame that the OP can't see that their new loot system is horribly, horribly flawed.
#41Tavarde, Posted: Feb 10 2009 at 10:31 AM, Rating: Unrated, (Expand Post) You can all think what you want because ultimately this thread has gotten out of control. I don't post here to be disagreed with. Chances are the vast majority of you who hate this system are the sort of people who wouldn't benefit from it (i.e. not a class lead or officer). Well of course "you" would think it's awful.
#42 Feb 10 2009 at 10:37 AM Rating: Good
***
1,487 posts
guilds should be about communism. It isn't a business. Items in the guild bank don't cost money. It's about having fun. Everyone should be equal. If you need an item, roll on it. I just don't see how that system is unfair. It's all random chance with drops and rolls.

That's the problem with raiding guilds. You guys don't actually like each other, and probably don't even like playing the game together. Why play the game if you aren't having fun?
____________________________
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
Life's too short to drink bad beer
#43 Feb 10 2009 at 10:42 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
1,634 posts
Sounds like you fixed it till it broke.

The system sounds unfair to me. Having a multiplier on some people and not others implies that some people are better than others.

Sounds like a caste system to me...

I think that pure random is the most fair, but it's the least common sense. (There is no reason behind it - so stupidity happens. Why did he get that that drop when it's only a marginal increase, but would have been a massive boost for her.)

Like any form of management or leadership, it's not easy. If it WAS easy you could simply pick some random system and it would do it all for you.

____________________________
Most things you worry about never happen anyway.
#44 Feb 10 2009 at 10:44 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,505 posts
Quote:
You can all think what you want because ultimately this thread has gotten out of control. I don't post here to be disagreed with. Chances are the vast majority of you who hate this system are the sort of people who wouldn't benefit from it (i.e. not a class lead or officer). Well of course "you" would think it's awful.

Why would people disagree with a looting system that virtually hands over all items to the officers in a guild?

Quote:
The owner of a business makes the most money and receives the most benefit because he is at the top. His management staff are the next in line because they do all the hard work for him. In turn, the regular employees do all the work for the management staff. How can anyone not see this structure as inherent to any guild?

If that's how your guild is run you should start paying your guildies.

Quote:
**Oh, and I'll be deleting the OP, I don't need to hear from any more of you. Because you're all 100% wrong anyway.

Smiley: disappointed
____________________________
Nyke- Nordrassil

Quote:
Here, if you have a milkshake, and I have a milkshake, and I have a straw. There it is, that's a straw, you see? You watching?. And my straw reaches acroooooooss the room, and starts to drink your milkshake... I... drink... your... milkshake! I drink it up!
#45 Feb 10 2009 at 10:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Suggestion:

If you can't handle anyone disagreeing with you then don't post on the internet. Period.

What we have here is a majority of different people, with varied backgrounds, disagreeing with you in a mostly mature manner. They have given valid arguments as to why.

Many actually took the time to explain why and offer alternatives, thank them.

This thread did not get out of control.

Your reaction is probably the most immature response in this whole thread and says a lot about your character.

You said you didn't need anyone's affirmation, so why did you post this? If you didn't need affirmation then why did you throw a tantrum when you didn't get it?

It would be beneficial for your guild-members to read this thread. (beneficial is subjective here)







____________________________
Beulahmae Arboreal Druid Doomhammer
#46 Feb 10 2009 at 10:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
*
101 posts
Quote:
You can all think what you want because ultimately this thread has gotten out of control. I don't post here to be disagreed with. Chances are the vast majority of you who hate this system are the sort of people who wouldn't benefit from it (i.e. not a class lead or officer). Well of course "you" would think it's awful.

The owner of a business makes the most money and receives the most benefit because he is at the top. His management staff are the next in line because they do all the hard work for him. In turn, the regular employees do all the work for the management staff. How can anyone not see this structure as inherent to any guild? Our previous system was kind of like communism.

And we all know how that typically turns out.

**Oh, and I'll be deleting the OP, I don't need to hear from any more of you. Because you're all 100% wrong anyway.

Wow. Pathetic, and ironic in that your OP and this last one had more QQing than the people you were trying to put down. AS another poster said I hope your guild crashes and burns and that the server knows you are one of the primary reasons.

You do so much of the hard work, and the regular employees work for you, lmao. So when you do 25 mans, really the peons are just there for body count, you and the GM do all the work.

I think the name of your priest says all anybody needs to know about you.
Quote:
Nohealsgfy, Draenei Priest
Don't get me wrong, I have a priest and he's shadow so no heals, thought in the previous arena seasons I was disc/holy and obviously healed my partners. It's just people who choose names like that are so cliche` and it shows your mind set, as does your posts.
#47 Feb 10 2009 at 10:46 AM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
**
460 posts
Tavarde wrote:
You can all think what you want because ultimately this thread has gotten out of control. I don't post here to be disagreed with. Chances are the vast majority of you who hate this system are the sort of people who wouldn't benefit from it (i.e. not a class lead or officer). Well of course "you" would think it's awful.

The owner of a business makes the most money and receives the most benefit because he is at the top. His management staff are the next in line because they do all the hard work for him. In turn, the regular employees do all the work for the management staff. How can anyone not see this structure as inherent to any guild? Our previous system was kind of like communism.

And we all know how that typically turns out.

**Oh, and I'll be deleting the OP, I don't need to hear from any more of you. Because you're all 100% wrong anyway.


Wow congratulations, this is the most negative post I have ever read. To be honest I've always seen a guild as a non profit organization not as a business. The guild officers are there to give structure not just to reap the loot. I really can't see people staying in your guild if this kind of attitude is prevalent throughout the officers. But then again anyone who disagrees with you is 100% wrong so I must be talking out of my behind. What is it like to be all knowing?
____________________________
"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day. "

~Frank Sinatra
#48 Feb 10 2009 at 10:48 AM Rating: Excellent
Guru
***
2,590 posts
Tavarde wrote:
I don't post here to be disagreed with.


Why did you post, then?

Quote:
Chances are the vast majority of you who hate this system are the sort of people who wouldn't benefit from it (i.e. not a class lead or officer). Well of course "you" would think it's awful.


We're not in your guild, we get no benefit from your loot system either way.

Quote:
The owner of a business makes the most money and receives the most benefit because he is at the top. His management staff are the next in line because they do all the hard work for him. In turn, the regular employees do all the work for the management staff. How can anyone not see this structure as inherent to any guild? Our previous system was kind of like communism.

And we all know how that typically turns out.


Wrong. Any guild that works in this way, in fact, is probably going to combust sooner rather than later. A guild is not a business, rather it is like a small and very grumpy nation. When a leader begins lining his pockets through the masses' efforts, there will be discontent and a tendency toward rebellion. A leader volunteers for his position and should not expect any reward other than the greater authority that comes with increased responsibility.

Quote:
**Oh, and I'll be deleting the OP, I don't need to hear from any more of you. Because you're all 100% wrong anyway.


In that case, might I suggest getting a LiveJournal rather than posting on discussion boards?
____________________________
Moon Guard (Alliance) & Wyrmrest Accord (Both Factions)
#49 Feb 10 2009 at 10:48 AM Rating: Excellent
Sage
**
658 posts
/shrug

Let him think we're wrong. His guildies are going to quit "by the dozens" and the only new recruits they'll be able to pick up are those desperate enough or ignorant enough to deal with the system. Eventually, they'll have to promote people to officer just to keep them in the guild. When every raider is an officer and no one is willing to sit at the bottom propping up the bloated so-called leadership, they'll have the same problems all over again. Just with worse people.

I do feel kinda bad for the good raiders in the guild who will have to pay the price for the gm's and officer's folly.

Oh, and OP - to use your capitalism example, just keep in mind the saying "you get what you pay for." If you're offering the bulk of your raiders scraps, you'll get the quality of raider that will accept them.
____________________________
Be who you are and say what you feel, for those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.

-Dr. Seuss
#50 Feb 10 2009 at 10:49 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
11,576 posts
Tavarde wrote:
You can all think what you want because ultimately this thread has gotten out of control. I don't post here to be disagreed with. Chances are the vast majority of you who hate this system are the sort of people who wouldn't benefit from it (i.e. not a class lead or officer). Well of course "you" would think it's awful.





Leadership is responsibility, not privilege. Leading a guild or a raid in WoW is a volunteer position, not a paid position. If people don't want the responsibility, they ought not be leaders. If they want extra compensation, they ought not be leaders. Downing raid bosses is what produces loot from raids, not managing the guild bank, recruiting, or anything of the sort. Those other things are important, but if you're standing around Dalaran recruiting or organizing the guild bank, you're not downing raid bosses. Spending 30 minutes moving crap from one tab to the next doesn't give you some uber buff that lets you go in and solo heroic Naxx. There are plenty of other perks that can be tossed at your GM/officers that don't involve putting them ahead of everyone else for looting privileges on a more or less permanent basis.

Quote:
The owner of a business makes the most money and receives the most benefit because he is at the top. His management staff are the next in line because they do all the hard work for him. In turn, the regular employees do all the work for the management staff. How can anyone not see this structure as inherent to any guild? Our previous system was kind of like communism.

And we all know how that typically turns out.


No, the owner of a business makes the most money because he takes the largest risk. If the business fails, the employees lose their jobs. Harsh, but that's it. They go out and find another job. The owner, on the other hand, usually ends up in bankruptcy, loses any assets they leveraged to finance the (now failed) business, and while the employees are out job hunting, the business owner is cleaning up the mess. That's why business owners get the lion's share of the profits.

If a raid group wipes, everyone gets the 10% durability loss. Everyone loses their food/elixir buffs. Everyone loses the same amount of time to go back in and rebuff to try again. If the wipes keep happening and everyone but the GM leaves the guild for greener pastures, the GM still has a guild, still has a guild bank paid for, and either starts over or transfers guild ownership to an alt and finds another guild to join with their main.

See the difference?

Quote:
**Oh, and I'll be deleting the OP, I don't need to hear from any more of you. Because you're all 100% wrong anyway.


Crass.

Oh wait! I get it. You're taking the role of a whiner and evaluating our response to you! Ahhh...very tricky. Good one.
#51 Feb 10 2009 at 10:52 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
****
4,100 posts
Tavarde,

You came here deliberately asking us what we thought of the situation. A large degree (if not all) think the way your Guild Managament was handling the issue was wrong, and gave yourself and your other officers an unfair advantage over everyone else.

You deleted your OP and cried about how we're all wrong, despite asking us for our input on the subject. You and your Guild Management are obviously self-centered and stubborn to the point that you're willing to deconstruct your Guild over it. Why post for advice and input if you're not willing to listen to it?

I run a Guild. We raid casually. It's equal dibs for all, myself and my officers are in no way allowed to benefit from their entitlement of being officers. If they wish to progress further and equip themselve better than the rest of the Guild, they must seek those means on their own. And they are all ok with that, because with equal share in what drops during raids means that everyone feels equal, everyone works together well, and morale is high. This all equals a more enjoyable experience and is the very reason we've been raiding together for well over 1 year solid without the loss of a single member.

Guilds like yours are yet to realize the benefit to treating everyone equally that raids. If someone puts in the time to help progress a "single" raid event, they're efforts alone deserve reward (be it ability to roll loot then, or DKP useable in the future). Without equal reward, no one is going to work with you, or for you. It's not a hard concept.

Seriously consider the next time you seek info/input/advice. You're not going to get a serious response acting like you just did, and it "will" be remembered that you're that "QQ'in officer that deleted your OP because no one agrees with your tyrannical guild design".
____________________________
Common sense is not so common -Voltaire
Wyne Aeros - Hyperion Server
ARRFishing.com

This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 0 All times are in CDT