How do you rate up or down someone?
-chap-
RateFollow
I am Cairne, chief of the Bloodhoof tauren. You greenskins fight with savagery and valor. I am intrigued.
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
You can't until you have a 3.0/decent rating, I think, and maybe something like 10 posts minimum.
Karthal - Moon Guard - Warrior [A]
Katran - Moon Guard - Warlock [A]
Taurun - Moon Guard - Shaman [H]
Stygius - Moon Guard - Death Knight [A]
Katekat - Moon Guard - Paladin [A]
Karthal(FFXI) - Seraph Server - Warrior 75, BeastMaster 70
Katran - Moon Guard - Warlock [A]
Taurun - Moon Guard - Shaman [H]
Stygius - Moon Guard - Death Knight [A]
Katekat - Moon Guard - Paladin [A]
Karthal(FFXI) - Seraph Server - Warrior 75, BeastMaster 70
and how do i get that kind of rating?
I am Cairne, chief of the Bloodhoof tauren. You greenskins fight with savagery and valor. I am intrigued.
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
Make quality posts that other people rate you up for, and not down.
Karthal - Moon Guard - Warrior [A]
Katran - Moon Guard - Warlock [A]
Taurun - Moon Guard - Shaman [H]
Stygius - Moon Guard - Death Knight [A]
Katekat - Moon Guard - Paladin [A]
Karthal(FFXI) - Seraph Server - Warrior 75, BeastMaster 70
Katran - Moon Guard - Warlock [A]
Taurun - Moon Guard - Shaman [H]
Stygius - Moon Guard - Death Knight [A]
Katekat - Moon Guard - Paladin [A]
Karthal(FFXI) - Seraph Server - Warrior 75, BeastMaster 70
Hey Karthal you just got a rate up for being helpfull /gasp
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Mistress Darqflame wrote:
Usagi wrote:
I @#%^ing challenge you to rate it down.
Last question is Where is the rate up/down button because i think Karthal
Scholar deserves one =)
-Chap-
Scholar deserves one =)
-Chap-
I am Cairne, chief of the Bloodhoof tauren. You greenskins fight with savagery and valor. I am intrigued.
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
As stated above, you can't rate until other people rate you up to the point where your karma gets high enough that you become a scholar.
When you become a scholar, you'll see a red arrow to rate down and a green arrow to rate up.
When you become a scholar, you'll see a red arrow to rate down and a green arrow to rate up.
[wowsig]2262328[/wowsig]
Getaggronoob----lvl 80 Bloodelf Paladin-------Deathhunter--lvl 72 Orc Hunter
Deathgaze-------lvl 66 Undead Warlock-----Deathzsword--lvl 72 Undead Warrior
Sneakypeat---lvl 66 Undead Rogue------Bigginbeefy-----lvl 66 Tauren Shaman
Healmenoob---lvl 72 Undead Priest------Diispet--------lvl 71 BE Mage
Cowmageddon---lvl 80 Death Knight
Getaggronoob----lvl 80 Bloodelf Paladin-------Deathhunter--lvl 72 Orc Hunter
Deathgaze-------lvl 66 Undead Warlock-----Deathzsword--lvl 72 Undead Warrior
Sneakypeat---lvl 66 Undead Rogue------Bigginbeefy-----lvl 66 Tauren Shaman
Healmenoob---lvl 72 Undead Priest------Diispet--------lvl 71 BE Mage
Cowmageddon---lvl 80 Death Knight
You shouldn't talk about rating. You may just say the word that shant be spoken. Its bad luck....
chapsterz wrote:
Last question is Where is the rate up/down button because i think Karthal
Scholar deserves one =)
-Chap-
Scholar deserves one =)
-Chap-
Once you have said status, a little green and red arrow appears by people's names with their post, that you can click on to rate up or down that person.
My name DOES have an X and an M , and is in no way related to Joaquin off Star Trek and
NO you cannot have my babies, if you did what would i eat for Sunday lunch then?
NO you cannot have my babies, if you did what would i eat for Sunday lunch then?
Then how did the first person become a Scholar, did a GM/Admin rate them up?
-Chap-
-Chap-
I am Cairne, chief of the Bloodhoof tauren. You greenskins fight with savagery and valor. I am intrigued.
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
chapsterz wrote:
Then how did the first person become a Scholar, did a GM/Admin rate them up?
-Chap-
-Chap-
...
Does it really matter? That was a long time ago.
emmitsvenson wrote:
Blizzard IT people don't get paid $50k a month (or whatever) to make sure one guy in Bumblehump, Nebraska can kick a Murloc on Tuesday morning.
chapsterz wrote:
Then how did the first person become a Scholar, did a GM/Admin rate them up?
-Chap-
-Chap-
That's like asking, "Who created God?"
[wowsig]2545217[/wowsig]
Scholar
19 posts
For some further clarification from the FAQs:
I've been in there a lot recently.
Quote:
Q: I see posters rated as Scholar, Sage and Guru. What's up with that and how do I get a title?
A: That is part of the Karma system. Your Karma rating is determined by averaging every rating your posts have received from the users of the site. The rating comes from posts made under your registered name on any of the rated forums for any game covered by allakhazam.com, but does not include posts on user journals. You must have at least 15 posts before you receive a Karma rating. Then any future post you make will start out at your Karma level. Anonymous posts start at a rating of 2. Titles are assigned to your posts according to the following scale:
Karma below 3 = user. Posts are in orange.
Karma between 3.01 and 3.65 = scholar. Posts are in light blue.
Karma between 3.66 and 4.34 = sage. Posts are in green.
Karma between 4.35 and 5 = guru. Posts are in red.
Administrators posts are in maroon.
Q: What are the karma ratings?
A: Excellent = 5.0
Good = 4.0
Decent = 3.0
Default = 2.0
Awful = 1.0
A: That is part of the Karma system. Your Karma rating is determined by averaging every rating your posts have received from the users of the site. The rating comes from posts made under your registered name on any of the rated forums for any game covered by allakhazam.com, but does not include posts on user journals. You must have at least 15 posts before you receive a Karma rating. Then any future post you make will start out at your Karma level. Anonymous posts start at a rating of 2. Titles are assigned to your posts according to the following scale:
Karma below 3 = user. Posts are in orange.
Karma between 3.01 and 3.65 = scholar. Posts are in light blue.
Karma between 3.66 and 4.34 = sage. Posts are in green.
Karma between 4.35 and 5 = guru. Posts are in red.
Administrators posts are in maroon.
Q: What are the karma ratings?
A: Excellent = 5.0
Good = 4.0
Decent = 3.0
Default = 2.0
Awful = 1.0
I've been in there a lot recently.
So i guess i have 3.00 so does that mean +1 rate up make me over the 3.01 limit automaticly putting me in the scholar position!?
-Chap-
-Chap-
I am Cairne, chief of the Bloodhoof tauren. You greenskins fight with savagery and valor. I am intrigued.
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
As long as you're not sub default, who cares?
Scholar status doesn't really mean anything except you can nuke people who disagree with you or annoy you (as the majority do, I would imagine). Or you can use them for good, of course (I assume there is a small minority of posters doing this). But in the end, in less you manage to sub default them you achieve nothing. Scholaring someone when the title implies nothing more than a sunny disposition to your fellow human being achieves nothing, apart from perhaps impressing a few wide eyed newbies to the boards who have not realised that most scholars are as clueless as the next poster.
I would hope that any sensible human being would judge a post by its content and not by the fact that the op has a blue/green/red name.
P.S No offence to any Scholar/Sage/Guru who knows whathe/she is talking about.
P.P.S This post may come off as bitter. This is not the emotion behind the post.
Scholar status doesn't really mean anything except you can nuke people who disagree with you or annoy you (as the majority do, I would imagine). Or you can use them for good, of course (I assume there is a small minority of posters doing this). But in the end, in less you manage to sub default them you achieve nothing. Scholaring someone when the title implies nothing more than a sunny disposition to your fellow human being achieves nothing, apart from perhaps impressing a few wide eyed newbies to the boards who have not realised that most scholars are as clueless as the next poster.
I would hope that any sensible human being would judge a post by its content and not by the fact that the op has a blue/green/red name.
P.S No offence to any Scholar/Sage/Guru who knows whathe/she is talking about.
P.P.S This post may come off as bitter. This is not the emotion behind the post.
6/6 SSC 4/4 TK 3/5 HS 3/9 BT
Kavek 70 Mage, Genjuros EU
(I am not Greek)
Kavek 70 Mage, Genjuros EU
(I am not Greek)
KKaveKK wrote:
As long as you're not sub default, who cares?
Scholar status doesn't really mean anything except you can nuke people who disagree with you or annoy you (as the majority do, I would imagine). Or you can use them for good, of course (I assume there is a small minority of posters doing this). But in the end, in less you manage to sub default them you achieve nothing. Scholaring someone when the title implies nothing more than a sunny disposition to your fellow human being achieves nothing, apart from perhaps impressing a few wide eyed newbies to the boards who have not realised that most scholars are as clueless as the next poster.
I would hope that any sensible human being would judge a post by its content and not by the fact that the op has a blue/green/red name.
P.S No offence to any Scholar/Sage/Guru who knows whathe/she is talking about.
P.P.S This post may come off as bitter. This is not the emotion behind the post.
Scholar status doesn't really mean anything except you can nuke people who disagree with you or annoy you (as the majority do, I would imagine). Or you can use them for good, of course (I assume there is a small minority of posters doing this). But in the end, in less you manage to sub default them you achieve nothing. Scholaring someone when the title implies nothing more than a sunny disposition to your fellow human being achieves nothing, apart from perhaps impressing a few wide eyed newbies to the boards who have not realised that most scholars are as clueless as the next poster.
I would hope that any sensible human being would judge a post by its content and not by the fact that the op has a blue/green/red name.
P.S No offence to any Scholar/Sage/Guru who knows whathe/she is talking about.
P.P.S This post may come off as bitter. This is not the emotion behind the post.
The board is available to anyone and anyone can post. Some people can give bad or misdirecting posts, some people give good posts. Sage is sort of indicator that the person's post are positive contributions (in general).
The Karma serves like a kind of reputation. If someone is, say, Guru it means his posts are usually good and if you get answers from a Guru poster it's likely (note: LIKELY) to be a helpful post. If someone is a spammer he'll get subdefaulted quickly.
NOTE: I may post comments about my like/dislike/approval/disapproval of game features.
1- They are NOT a complaint. They are a perspective.
2- They are NOT advocacy. They are a perspective.
1- They are NOT a complaint. They are a perspective.
2- They are NOT advocacy. They are a perspective.
Overlord Theophany wrote:
Insults aren't needed
Quote:
Then how did the first person become a Scholar, did a GM/Admin rate them up?
The REAL question is what came first? The chicken? Or the Egg.
I know the answer, and am not willing the share such blasphemous answers.
So why does he get to be a Scholar with such offrailing comments, even though i enjoyed it.
-Chap-
P.S: Still wonder which GM got to pick the first scholar and give him infinite power of rating up/down.
-Chap-
P.S: Still wonder which GM got to pick the first scholar and give him infinite power of rating up/down.
I am Cairne, chief of the Bloodhoof tauren. You greenskins fight with savagery and valor. I am intrigued.
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
Quote:
i think Karthal Scholar deserves on
Who the hell is Karthal Scholar??
BANNED
I said : Scholar deserves one =) ; Also are you blind? he is a poster like you and me, (hint) he posted first
-Chap-
-Chap-
I am Cairne, chief of the Bloodhoof tauren. You greenskins fight with savagery and valor. I am intrigued.
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
speaking of which where is my posting karma? i cant find it anymore
70 Tauren Shaman - Enhance
70 Blood Elf Mage - Arcane
║║╔╗╠╗║╔╗
╠╣║║║╔╣╠╝
║║╚╝║╚╝╚═
(Sorry whoever i nicked this from, but it is very charming)
70 Blood Elf Mage - Arcane
║║╔╗╠╗║╔╗
╠╣║║║╔╣╠╝
║║╚╝║╚╝╚═
(Sorry whoever i nicked this from, but it is very charming)
Tooheys wrote:
speaking of which where is my posting karma? i cant find it anymore
They removed it for some reason or another. The details were a little foggy in the thread about it in the Site and Forum Feedback thread on it.
DaBadmon wrote:
Quote:
Then how did the first person become a Scholar, did a GM/Admin rate them up?
The REAL question is what came first? The chicken? Or the Egg.
I know the answer, and am not willing the share such blasphemous answers.
Oh dun get me started on the whole evolutionary theory of forums (And then there was light etc)... Not that I want to anyway.
I am a Lurker
Androz the Warlock wrote:
Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Arena is a fearing game for me, so hate meee..
But how does one knows he/she has optained certain points of Karma, is there no way we can check, is the only solution waiting to be a scholar?
-Chap-
-Chap-
I am Cairne, chief of the Bloodhoof tauren. You greenskins fight with savagery and valor. I am intrigued.
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
-Cairne Bloodhoof-
What happens when you get sub-default anyway? Can`t you post anymore?
PS: The chicken was there first. She then crossed the road and got hit by a truck :P
Edited, Aug 21st 2007 8:05:10am by frostfiremage
PS: The chicken was there first. She then crossed the road and got hit by a truck :P
Edited, Aug 21st 2007 8:05:10am by frostfiremage
Dwarf Hunter (lev 48)
Human Priest (lev 29)
Orc Warlock (lev 31)
Undead Priest (lev 14)
Belf Paladin (lev 14)
Human Priest (lev 29)
Orc Warlock (lev 31)
Undead Priest (lev 14)
Belf Paladin (lev 14)
chapsterz wrote:
But how does one knows he/she has optained certain points of Karma, is there no way we can check, is the only solution waiting to be a scholar?
As Poldaron said, they removed it for some reason or another. You must wait and see.
debadmon wrote:
Chicken or Egg?
Assuming you accept evolution as fact, the egg came first. Go back in time, through the evolution of chickens and eggs. You'll soon reach the point where the ancestors of chickens were reptiles, which no longer have any attributes of the creature we know today as the chicken. You have to go back much further, past reptiles, before the objects laid by these pre-chickens can no longer be classified as eggs.
Muse - giving smart-*** answers to questioins since...ooh, ages ago.
Recent Visitors: 0
All times are in CDT
© 2018 ZAM Network LLC