Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Rules for duelling?Follow

#52 Jun 07 2005 at 12:22 PM Rating: Good
@#%^
*****
15,953 posts
/claimed 4tw!

Edited, Tue Jun 7 13:23:01 2005 by Iamadam
____________________________
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"

#53 Jun 07 2005 at 1:03 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,003 posts
Quote:
Now we are redefining what a duel is? According to the dictionary there is nothing about a test or trial for a duel.


It doesn't matter what the dictionary definition is. Blizzard could call it jousting for all I care. It doesn't matter what it is called, what matters is what it is.

In WoW a duel is a test of skill.




I am going to keep repeating this over and over again until you understand it (as foolish as that is):

If you NEED a pot or engineering item to win a duel then you have already lost.

If the only way you can beat me is with your engineering trinket than that says a very negative thing about you. You need special help to win, you can't do it with natural abilities.

It's like when I'm dueling another rogue and he hits his evasion cool down ability. It's stupid if he needs that to win, and what usually happens is I just hit mine i nretaliation and win the duel anyways.
#54 Jun 07 2005 at 1:11 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
51 posts
What a big bunch on whiners. Who cares what they use in a duel. As has been said, you dont die, you dont give CP to the person you lost too etc. So if you die to a guy who wants to use a pot or bomb to win, then what does it matter?
Those arguing that using a pot is showing off your money instead of using skill is just plain stupid. Pots in comparison to armor are INSANELY cheaper to buy and use, so if your going to complain about me using a pot to show off my money, then are you also complaining that the person who had enough gold to buy Blue or Epic gear is just showing off his money and doesnt have skill? I really hope you dont, and if you dont, then dont ***** that he spent an extra OMFG 30s to buy and use a pot.
Finally nowhere does it say a duel is a test of your basic skills/talents/etc native to your specific job. A duel is a duel is a duel, its a FIGHT between two characters. If you wish to only use skills native to your job then make sure you specify that with the person you are going to duel, and then if they break that aggreement you have reason to *****.
-Dicdonya
#55 Jun 07 2005 at 1:20 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
446 posts
some people think higher than others... which is very evident and why we have variety. a duel is a test of skill period. its not "just a fight" between 2 people. its a fight that is supposed to have honorable reasons. there is a reason behind each duel. which is to test ones power, for the most part.

if you dont have the power to win on your own, and have to rely on other things. your not doing a good job with your class. you may not have anything but the armor on your back and weapon in hand to win against someone in the world.

that is where skill comes in. to win using only what skills you posses and the equipment you carry. you can run out of any and most items. but your skills never go away.
____________________________
Scalazar Warlock
Mordimer Mage
Kaiser Paladin (PVP) (retired)
#56 Jun 07 2005 at 1:35 PM Rating: Decent
15 posts
How is having better equipment than another player skill? Your equipment is limited too by gold. If you had an infinite supply of gold, you would always have the best equipment available to you. The reason you don't is because your gold runs out. You make choices with how you want to spend it. If you want to spend your 50g on a better weapon, that is your own perogative. If someone wants to spend their 50g on a profession(a skill they have), that is their own perogative too. No character should be penalized for choosing a "dishonorable" profession over a "honorable" piece of equipment.

No duel is a true test of skill. A true test of skill would require all things to be equal, and that simply is never the case. A person with better equipment could beat someone with horrible equipment even if the loser is a better player. The test of skill in a duel is how successful you can be with whatever resources you have.
#57 Jun 07 2005 at 2:18 PM Rating: Decent
*
128 posts
Quote:
The idea for a duel is supposed to be player skill VS another players skill. ONLY using what skills your class has. no potions. no proffessions. nothing but the skills/spells/talents your class has.


So you *do* duel naked, eh? ;-)

A character in WoW is more than his class. That's one of the coolest things in the game, from what he wears to what he knows to what he farms to what he creates, it's all configurable.

To say that when fighting each character can only bring a subset of what he's configured as doesn't really make much sense. What's it based on? Why is my skill of knowing when and what kind of pot to use (and the way WoW is set up it makes a huge difference if I use a mana or health pot; there's usually only time for one in any duel), any less valid than your skill of knowing when to activate your 2 minute cool down skill? Why is my access to pots any more out of bounds than your access to, say, a sword you made as a Blacksmith?

I have NO problem with setting up rules before a duel; in fact it can be the BEST type of learning experience. I dueled a rogue who told me to cast Fairy Fire on him before he did anything; he wanted to see exactly what it did to him in the dueling environment rather than out in pvp with the Horde. (Can a Horde caster even cast FF?) Anyway, so if people want to fight with a "no pots" rule, great. I actually recommend setting up different dueling rules in order to practice for honor pvp.

But to assume that it's somehow "right" or "more fair" or "better" is misguided. It's just different, and unless you fight naked... you really don't have a logical leg to stand on. :-)
#58 Jun 07 2005 at 2:27 PM Rating: Decent
*
128 posts
Quote:
I am going to keep repeating this over and over again until you understand it (as foolish as that is):

If you NEED a pot or engineering item to win a duel then you have already lost.

If the only way you can beat me is with your engineering trinket than that says a very negative thing about you. You need special help to win, you can't do it with natural abilities.


Your definition of what's "natural" in WoW has no basis in reality.

There are no natural abilities. It's a computer program. There's nothing real here. It's ALL a construct.

If you can't handle someone's use of their character, for example the Alchemist with a pretty much unlimited supply of pots, then it says more about your ability to cope, or lack of it, in the WoW universe than it says about the Alchemist.
#59 Jun 07 2005 at 2:33 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
446 posts
Quote:
So you *do* duel naked, eh? ;-)


sounds like you do too :)

ill duel anyone anyway they want. some just give better results than others. I know for a fact if i use nothing more than my skills as a mage/warlock/paladin and beat someone who used pots and bombs and everything else, i have alot more skill than they do. I used less resources to accomplish the same thing, and often it can be repeated. this makes me more skilled and more efficient. as each use of what I had was better placed than theirs.
____________________________
Scalazar Warlock
Mordimer Mage
Kaiser Paladin (PVP) (retired)
#60 Jun 07 2005 at 2:44 PM Rating: Decent
*
128 posts
Quote:
I know for a fact if i use nothing more than my skills as a mage/warlock/paladin and beat someone who used pots and bombs and everything else, i have alot more skill than they do.


I actually agree usually... I've found that some classes have it over others IMO, so sometimes it's a good dose of luck of the crit, etc, instead of straight up skill. But in general you're right in my book. Working with minimal options IS a skill, and not a bad one to have.

That said, the self righteous and self important attitude of the jerk 3 levels higher than me who plants an uninvited flag on me, uses some wierd "natural" talent/spell/whatever to turn me into a chicken, then says "u have no honor noob!" when I use a pot that I leveled up for, quested for the recipe, farmed the herbs for, bought the flask for and finally crafted is what I laugh at. It's just such a wierd view of the game.
#61 Jun 07 2005 at 2:54 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
446 posts
Quote:
I've found that some classes have it over others IMO, so sometimes it's a good dose of luck of the crit, etc, instead of straight up skill.


each class was designed to be balanced with each other. so no one class can "end all, be all" of PVP. but a good player can have a good 80% win rate or more. and different talent trees change what a class is a good at as well.
____________________________
Scalazar Warlock
Mordimer Mage
Kaiser Paladin (PVP) (retired)
#62 Jun 07 2005 at 3:05 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,463 posts
By the logic I'm seeing on this thread, anyone who plays an undead, anyone, is a gimped low-ranking nincompoop from the start - because they need to have something that no one else has in order to win, will of the forsaken.

Let's face it, there is no price (except being so dang ugly the smell actually comes through the screen! UGH!) for being undead and gaining this incredible advantage.

No other racial skill even comes close to it in usefulness - for most situations.

And even if a few other race's skills were close to it in usefulness, anyone playing those races would fall under the same ax - you useless inncompoop - you are so worthless you had to pick a *whatever* in order to win. You couldn't use your *skill* to win with a lesser race.

See how your logic comes back around to bite you on your asp?

I'm tired of this thread and this subject. If someone comes up and shoves a "drive-by duel offer" in my face, from now on I'm pulling every bit of overkill out I can and using it - potions, bombs, exploding sheep, whatever! I'm laying it on thick, too!

If you want rules in a duel, make the rules and make sure the other guy agrees to em before starting. Otherwise, quit yer bellyaching!
#63 Jun 07 2005 at 4:10 PM Rating: Good
***
3,771 posts
Whether or not I use a potion, the chat message still says I defeated you in a duel.


EDIT: I think allegory may be arguing something else entirely. Not that using pots is "cheating" , but that you are missing out on a free opportunity to learn more about your class and what you can do if you end up stuck in a bad situation.

Duels are different things for different people. They are always good ways to help you become better at your job, but sometimes you just want to win.

Edited, Tue Jun 7 17:18:14 2005 by highRfrequenC
#64 Jun 07 2005 at 4:38 PM Rating: Good
Annoying Ass
ZAM Administrator
Avatar
*****
12,049 posts
I think everything should go. Fight each fight like it's your last. If someone wants to duel me, so be it; it's a fight for my honor. So you can't die? Many people would rather die than be dishonored; they'd rather waste money than be showed up (look at middle class America. Ever notice that once one neighbor gets a pool, or a bid-screen TV, so do other neighbors? Even though they go into more debt? Yeah, it's sorta like that).

This debate is like using drugs in sports. People get offended: deeply offended. And why? Someone said using a potion in a duel is like going against a hockey player on steroids. Well, what if it turns out that hockey player wasn't on steroids, but pumped iron for hours while you ate pizza? Is it still cheating? Is it still wrong? "Oh, but pumping iron takes hours." Fine. He was born genetically pumped, and you're a tiny wimp (natural lottery sucks sometimes. You're proof in this example). Is it unfair now? If it's unfair for you... would it be wrong to take steroids?

The point is, everything should go. Interestingly enough, you have the option to buy potions (don't even need to be an alchemist!), use bandages, buy some lower-level bombs, take the time to get Crystal Charges (gosh-darn it, I loved these on my Paladin!!!!), etc. It makes no sense that consumables shouldn't be used. YOU could get them too. If you don't use them, it's your fault.

Odd that we don't point fingers at the losers who cry about illegal potions and call them stingy. Throw out money and time if you want to win.

Damn, now I sound like a conservative ^_^;. No, duels shouldn't be "the best money can buy"; but you don't need money to get everything. I've dueled higher level people with uber gear and won (fine, she was a level 60 Rogue gold-seller, and I was a 53 Paladin, but it was still fun :-D). Skill is still a significant factor. You can't use a potion or a bomb if you get stunned at a critical time. Knowing when to use consumables is a skill in and of itself; you can very easily waste a consumable and lose because of it. Cooldown timers teach this. And if duels hone your skills for PvP, and you use consumables there, then I think that duels would be the BEST place to learn when to use a consumable!

By the way, Linken's Boomerang is on the same timer as a Crystal Charge. You'll need to wait a minute before using a Charge if you start a battle with Linken's Boomerang. And you'd NEVER know that if not for dueling! Well, you might, but not too likely :-P
____________________________
Retired News Writer for the ZAM Network
WoW - Aureliano the Insane - level 90 Druid on Sen'Jin
Nanaoki - level 90 Mage on Sen'Jin
#65 Jun 07 2005 at 7:53 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,003 posts
Quote:
Whether or not I use a potion, the chat message still says I defeated you in a duel.


I guess this is where we differ. I don't see the point of a duel as to simply see the "defeated you in a duel" messsage. TO be honest I have defeated several high level cahracters in duels simply by forcing them into fleeing (either by keeping them feared out of the dueling area, or having them chase me out and then rooting them there), but in doing this I haven't really won anything (although it's always fun to do^^. If I just wanted to see the "I have defeated you in a duel" message and that was all that mattered, just winning, then I would fight a bunch of people 10 levels lower than me.

Quote:
EDIT: I think allegory may be arguing something else entirely. Not that using pots is "cheating" , but that you are missing out on a free opportunity to learn more about your class and what you can do if you end up stuck in a bad situation.


I guess I am arguing soemthing different. What I am trying to say is that I believe duels have a certain purpose, to test your player skill, and I feel that pots tend to defeat these purposes.

I don't feel a duel is a battle or war, I don't feel the point is simply to win it. When you are in A non-duel pvp situation (like regular faction against faction pvp, or maybe some fun in the arena with friends) I think everything goes, use every trick up your sleeve, you are there to win and that's all that matters.
#66 Jun 08 2005 at 2:14 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,392 posts
in my view the very reason for the duel is set up for a chance to train new ideas for PvP and see how well your character (note: character not class) is fairing against others at that point in a nice safe environment.

now in PvP i will not hesitate to use a bomb, trinket or potion if it means i don't end up dying and manage to swipe those precious CP.

so if i use dueling to test new techniques as to how to beat others why shouldn't i use an exploding sheep? if it allows me a new insight into how effectively it can be used in set situations isn't that more important than 'winning honour'?

if i beat you using a bomb or potion, does that not also give yourself another insight (usually stay away from anyone wearing a fishing bowl on their head ;))? can you yourself not learn from this fact and take it on to the PvP setting and be prepared for it when it arises or are you just sulking?

Allegory you mentioned earlier about a 'stupid' rogue who had to use evasion.................and? what does it matter? again he is testing a technique to see how well it fairs against a fellow rogue where he won't be punished if it all goes horribly wrong. it just sounds to me like you don't like surprises, and thats something you've got to learn to deal with. if someone takes you out at the last moment with a cooldown manouver or item you should be thinking how you can set yourself so that you are ready for it the next time and try to capitalise on it instead of constantly repeating 'If you NEED a pot or engineering item to win a duel then you have already lost.' over and over again and looking like a fool yourself, which from other posts i've seen of yours you are blatantly not.
____________________________
Istril - 70 Warrior

'Feral paladins should tank better than elemental warriors but subtlety warlocks should do the most dps.' - LordBEEF
#67 Jun 08 2005 at 5:17 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
462 posts
Why is there such a big hoo ha over using of items?

If people don't like it they can say before hand that no consumables.
Simple as that, but Allegory have you thought of Duel's as a form of practice for real PvP?

You will actually learn alot about timing of pots/ bandages/ using bombs etc. When you or your opponent uses it during a duel, it is then that you realise
"Ohhh you mean dolly the sheep can blow up?"
So when you actually meet your opposition fraction and you see that exact same sheep you know that it's time to run and run fast, or what other ways you can handle that sheep.

Maybe a nicely place frost nova will root it and cause it to explode out of range?

Then you start thinking about potions, being used in a duel. You should see it as a chance of practicing what you can do to conteract that effect.

e.g. a Duel with a War friend and I'm a mage. He pops a greater healing pot and is near to full hp and I'm nearly out of MP so what do I do? Do I run or is there anything I can do to overturn the odds?

With more of this kind of duels it actually taught me
@1 I could sheep him and use bandage + mana agates
@2 If I'm really low on MP I could choose to use my evocation to balance the odds and "reset" the match once more

Now once you're used to this kind of situations, the more practiced you are. The better you are prepared when you fight against the opposition fraction.

Seriously I prefer to fight against some1 who uses his full assortment of gagets especially people who uses engeeniering + alchemy (better still if that person uses both)

It poses a serious challenge, whereby you can test yourself to the limits.

"Honorable" fights is just for the idealist which teaches you nothing about the actual PvP when you meet an opposition horde/alliance

Edited, Wed Jun 8 06:27:51 2005 by Militades
____________________________
?A Knight is Sworn to Valor
His Words Speak only Truth
His Sword Defends the Helpless
His Might Upholds the Weak
His Wrath Undoes the Wicked?
- Sprit of King Arthur (From the Movie DragonHeart)
--------------------------------------------------
Militades NIN/WAR ffxi.allakhazam.com/profile.xml?36608
Militades PLD/WAR ffxi.allakhazam.com/profile.xml?5257
#68 Jun 08 2005 at 5:34 AM Rating: Decent
*
62 posts
i only use pots and crystal charges for pvp and really bad looking boss situations
but not for duel :x
#69 Jun 08 2005 at 5:37 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,747 posts
I don't really get what's so horrible about losing a duel to someone who used potions anyway... It's a fair bet that both of you know that you would be the winner if he hadn't used it, and he's the one who just spent the money, not you.

If you're worried what spectators might think, then you might have issues beyond potion use.
____________________________
FFXIV: Udo Kaputnik (Phoenix) 50WAR 50BLM ??WHM (in progress)
FFXI: Kaputnik (Ragnarok) 99SAM 99BST 99WHM 99BLM +++ (retired)
#70 Jun 08 2005 at 1:45 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,003 posts
Quote:
t just sounds to me like you don't like surprises
I don't like moot points and usage of outside tactics. Like I said I can win a great many duels by getting people to flee from me, but that really isn't winning.

I just find it annoying how I'm trying to play a game of chess and then the other guy decides to sent a plastic missle to my bishop and say "I sunk your battleship."
#71 Jun 09 2005 at 3:42 PM Rating: Decent
*
52 posts
I never seen an alliance (i play horde) use any kind of potion or engineering while PvP'ing me. (they usually die or flee before they get the chance :D)
So it's only if prepared you can use engineering, and after a while i PvP, you aren't.

So really it isn't practice, if u don't use it in PvP!
____________________________
Azjol Nerub

Spiridvoid:
Orc Warlock, LVL 60
Highest kill: 13lvl+ (Mage, lvl 47 vs. lvl 60)
Lowest death: 4 lvl- (Hunter, lvl 32 vs. lvl 28)
Member of United Guilds
#72 Jun 09 2005 at 4:03 PM Rating: Good
***
3,771 posts
Quote:
I just find it annoying how I'm trying to play a game of chess and then the other guy decides to sent a plastic missle to my bishop and say "I sunk your battleship."

So don't play chess with candyland pieces in the middle of the lunchroom floor.

false analogy
#73 Jun 10 2005 at 4:32 AM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,003 posts
Quote:
So don't play chess with candyland pieces in the middle of the lunchroom floor.


"False analogy."

Please explain more on my my statement is a false analogy (obviously if I realised how it was a false analogy I wouldn't have posted it, so I am blind to it). And please elaborate on what your analogy means (somewhat ambiguous).

But to continue the fun: It may be on the floor, but for the purposes of the duel the floor has been roped off and no one else may enter, nor SHOULD any foreign objects.
#74 Jun 10 2005 at 5:03 AM Rating: Decent
*
51 posts
I'm all for the anything goes side. If the dev's didn't think it was right they wouldn't let you use potions/devices in deuls. so there.

And, for the ones that say it's unfair, well did you pay to have your armor/weapons enchanted? Not everyone has that skill, can't duel with em. Make your own arom or armor kits with your leatherworking? Nope sorry I have Enchanting/Tailoring, no armor kits in duels please. What else? Um, oh I know. You seem to have a really good guild that does MC runs on a regular basis, hence the BoP drops that you're wearing now. Well, my guild is small and mostly low level, we can't do MC. None of those drops please.

whew ok /sarcasm off.

And on the subject of honor. Well, I don't remember who said it but, "There is no honor in defeat."

Edited, Fri Jun 10 06:13:36 2005 by rikkscerberus
#75 Jun 10 2005 at 5:51 AM Rating: Decent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,441 posts
There's been a lot of people arguing why not to use potions and others argue why to use them.

Someone said that using potions would be a duel for money instead of skills. Honestly, Allegory. It costs money to buy spells/abilities and it costs money to produce or buy potions. Please elaborate where the heck the difference is?

I use whatever I want in a duel. Gnomish Death Ray if needed. If you lose and *****, there's only one reply you'll get:

"DON'T FU[b][/b]CKING ACCEPT THE DUEL THEN!"

Really, the game is full of noobs thinking they can own anyone below their levels. I dare you. No, really, I dare you!

If you kick me fair and square, I'll respect you, but if you lose and go ****** because I wanted to use a potion or two, quit the game, 'cause you suck at life.


Iamadam wrote:
/claimed ftw woohooo, I b teh pwnz0rs omgz0r!!11one


FTFY

Edited, Fri Jun 10 06:55:44 2005 by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#76 Jun 10 2005 at 5:56 AM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,003 posts
Quote:
I'm all for the anything goes side. If the dev's didn't think it was right they wouldn't let you use potions/devices in deuls. so there.


The devs aren't supernatural beings, they're people, and they're also making a game, they want to give you options.

I have I guess my own personal view on the purpose of dueling (I assumed it was everybody's view since it seemed so fitting). I see dueling as a test of skill, that the point is not really to win, but that under wha tI consider normal standards it achieves the same effect.

As a rogue I have quite a few cooldowns I can use in a fight, I try to limit myself though, because I feel the duel is a test. I could probably go all out and use every single one of them and win very easily, but what would I have gained? A chat log message that says I defeated someone else in a duel, whoop ti doo.

I can understand the opposition's perspective now. They see the point of dueling to be winning, and when winning is all that matters of course it's fine to use everything you can to achieve victory. I don't see the point to be winning though. I open challenge people much higher (not ridiculously higher, but sometimes 7 levels+) and I know that I will probably lose, but if I can beat them or at least put up a good fight I will be overly prepared for someone my own level.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 0 All times are in CDT