Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

To boot or not to boot?Follow

#1 Nov 28 2009 at 6:15 PM Rating: Excellent
**
467 posts
I have a bit of a problem on my hands. In my social/event Linkshell (to which I am a sack holder) we have a member who is kind of a piece of crap (to put it mildly).

He's notorious for asking for help and when asked for help in return, he'll say he'll do it but then he mysteriously disappears/has to log/etc. when it comes time to do said event. This behavior has been witnessed by several sack holders on the LS.

Recently, I made the mistake of purchasing a few items for this player. It only amounted to a bit over 5000 gil. He swore he'd pay me back and now mysteriously he does not have the gil. It's not like the 5000 gil is going to break me but it's the principle of the matter. I've asked him several times now to pay me back and he either evades the topic or changes the subject.

Now I'm giving serious consideration to booting this player mainly because I'm afraid he's going to seriously ***** over one of our newer members one of these days. I've discussed him a little with the other sack holders but I haven't mentioned the idea of booting him yet. Many of them don't seem to care too much for this player from what I've heard.

Anyway, what are your thoughts on this matter? Forgive and forget or boot and begone?

____________________________
The devil's in the details...
#2 Nov 28 2009 at 6:24 PM Rating: Excellent
One flew over the cuckoo's nest
Avatar
******
29,185 posts
Get rid of him. No one wants someone like that around.
____________________________
BANNED

Creator and Leader of the Anti-Rog faction
#3 Nov 28 2009 at 6:25 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
1,102 posts
Whatever happened to confrontation? I mean if you're not a leader in the Linkshell I can understand not just being like "Listen dude, you don't help out anyone else, so stop asking for **** from everyone else like your Angelina Jolie's Tits or something.", but even still I would talk to the leaders of the LS and be like, "Can someone front this dude about the way he's acting?"
____________________________
------------------
#4 Nov 28 2009 at 6:25 PM Rating: Excellent
**
615 posts
Well, it depends.
When you say "social/event" I'm assuming you mostly mean a social shell with friends who hang out and *also* do events.
If that's the case, then you're pretty much in the same situation as I am.

We too have had this type of player. Each and every time, it's been settled once a few of the "core" members agree that we do witness this type of behaviour.
The shellholder had a talk with the offending member, letting them know "our playstyles, and what we're looking for in the shell are not compatible".
Most of them actually took the hint and left without (further) drama. Two exceptions *did* take offense, and were then told what the reason *really* was, down to the nitty gritty.
Of course, they denied everything.

Anyways, none of the core members felt like the shell would have been any richer a place for keeping these members on board, much the opposite.. and when it all comes down to it, that's what matters..

Otherwise, you just get people dreading to log in to the shell because they'll just be asked to help whomever with something for nothing in return, ever...

All comes down to how much of a "social" or how much of an "event" shell you're runninng though.
People get away with more in the former than the latter.

Best of luck either way

-Fin
#5 Nov 28 2009 at 6:26 PM Rating: Excellent
PM Me When You're Sober
Avatar
*****
15,787 posts
Lay down straight for him. Ask for an explanation. "xXSephirothXx, I need to talk to you. The other sackholders have been discussing your position in the LS as of late. We are beginning to fear your behavior is going to jeopardize others in the LS and we want to know if it is going to change." Unless that kind of warning has already been given. Then I'd say if he's really bad enough, kick him.
#6 Nov 28 2009 at 6:32 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
602 posts
I almost support your decision to boot this individual. However, where is the line drawn between linkshell business and private matters outside of the linkshell? It's fair to say the population of your server might welcome a player warning of some sorts but more than likely 5,000 gil issue will just be dealt with harsh criticism. In your case it's a private matter. Now if he's openly asked for help on the linkshell and gotten it and never returned help; then people should just stop helping this individual. Gil issues usually are a personal issue and I don't think you should jack his pearl based on just that.

My idea of a social linkshell structure would personally work the same way any event linkshell would run. If player A helps Player B with for example Artifact Armor. You could take time into account, 60 minutes to complete or you could use points. When you help someone then you gain points. The linkshell could then use these points to see who hasn't been a great helper. You could use your points to ask for help on missions and you would take priority of helping as a group in missions.

Something like that; though this is borderline babysitting and honestly most people are not in a shell to be serious about anything. Only just have someone to talk to and a better way to meet people. And of course more people to ask for help. FFXI is a community intensive game though. There are a lot of things where you'll need other peoples help.

A more simple approach that you could personally do like I have done. I have a full 200 page notebook with names of people who have helped me, lend me gil or given me items. I also record the names of all the people I have ever helped. I try to keep the notebook to a 50/50 balance. So if I got help for two things this week then I would go out of my way to help two other people. And obviously payback any gil that I have borrowed etc. It's the easiest way to give back to the community and get your name out there as a great player who is willing to do anything for anyone.

Out of ideas now but that should get you started. As a last point: you are the leader of a linkshell so in the end it's your responsibility to protect the other members in your linkshell. The gil issue is a red flag but it's a small amount. However him not wanting to pay you could be poison to the linkshell down the road. It might be in your best interest to remove him. Large endgame linkshells have been known to instantly fall apart due to one member causing tons of trouble. Protect your members at all costs. Even if someone is against you kicking that guy out. Leaders have to be willing to take criticism even if you might be in the right.

Edited, Nov 28th 2009 7:36pm by Excenmille
#7 Nov 28 2009 at 6:59 PM Rating: Excellent
**
467 posts
KaneIsthara wrote:
Whatever happened to confrontation? I mean if you're not a leader in the Linkshell I can understand not just being like "Listen dude, you don't help out anyone else, so stop asking for sh*t from everyone else like your Angelina Jolie's Tits or something.", but even still I would talk to the leaders of the LS and be like, "Can someone front this dude about the way he's acting?"


Oh I have no problem whatsoever confronting this member (or anyone else that pulls crap like this) and I have done so on several occasions. But mostly that was on a player to player level, never as a sack holder on the verge of booting an alleged offender.

However, I do agree that I need to discuss this with the other sack holders and the actual shell leader (which I am not).

Still, the input I've read here is helping to put this issue into perspective for me. So thanks for that.
____________________________
The devil's in the details...
#8 Nov 28 2009 at 7:12 PM Rating: Excellent
**
673 posts
Confront > give one more chance > boot

Seriously, lets be honest here. Team mates are so disposable and replaceable in MMORPG land that you don't need to take crap from people.


Further to the matter, it is because of these come-and-go-server-hop social practices that this very player is allowing himself to act the way he does. He doesn't really care if he gets kicked- or he would make more of an effort; and if he does get kicked, he'll just think "whatever" and move on to find the next pushover.

Don't bother wasting your time, give him one more chance to pay you out of generosity, then kick.
____________________________
95THF
Bismarck
#9 Nov 28 2009 at 7:14 PM Rating: Good
*
141 posts
I'd give him a test on it. Like ask for help with something you know he can help with like 2-3 and if he refuses to help then just boot him due to poor performance, and no reciprocation,
#10 Nov 28 2009 at 8:27 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,508 posts


Only takes one person to ruin a social shell if they're annoying enough.
____________________________
.:Seraph:.
Blu90/Drg90/Dnc90/Mnk90/Nin90/Rng75/Sam75/Bst66
Pld64/Cor50/Rdm50/War45//Thf38

Square Enix when ToAU first went live wrote:
The TP information included in "physical" blue magic spells is
only applicable when using the job ability "Chain Affinity."
#11 Nov 28 2009 at 8:49 PM Rating: Excellent
**
885 posts
renasci wrote:


Only takes one person to ruin a social shell if they're annoying enough.


Yep.

If you're worried about what the person would do to your newer, uninformed members about said person, that is a strong indication you should give him the boot or an ultimatum.

Social shells tends to get very delicate in drama-like situations. One bad discussion can split it apart before you realize whats happening. I usually have a zero tolerance for crap like that. If some one starts crossing lines, I warn them once, then boot if they continue, no questions asked. It's a matter of keeping your shell together vs. pleasing one individual. More so if you have a good amount of core members and/or a good amount of regular members that would be around for the long haul.
____________________________
Linkshell: HeavenisticChaos (Leader)
Server: Carbuncle

Party Camps in [S]. A Compilation.

EXP Alternatives. Location: [S].

Soloing BST in [S]. A level 20+ guide.
#12 Nov 28 2009 at 8:54 PM Rating: Good
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Get rid of him.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#13 Nov 28 2009 at 9:44 PM Rating: Good
****
4,720 posts
bsphil wrote:
Get rid of him.
____________________________
Reiterpallasch wrote:
Horst needs a 1 minute, 15 foot doom aura. Get in, get out, or @#%^ing die.
Calmus wrote:
...draining with sambas is kind of like you smack the thing and as you smack blood flies out... normally the blood would just you know fall and be red an what-not, but, with the samba your all whacked out and decide to drink the blood as it flys out. thus not adding MORE damage just taking more advantage of your damage. at least thats my take on it.
#14 Nov 28 2009 at 9:50 PM Rating: Good
19 posts
Princess ThePsychoticOne wrote:
Get rid of him. No one wants someone like that around.


What he said.
#15 Nov 28 2009 at 9:54 PM Rating: Excellent
Silent But Deadly
*****
19,999 posts
Find him in RL and punch him in the taint.

If that's not feasible, kick him from the shell.
____________________________
SUPER BANNED FOR FAILING TO POST 20K IN A TIMELY MANNER
#16 Nov 28 2009 at 10:24 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
Avatar
**
501 posts
I would confront him first, point out his obvious downfalls and then tell him to straighten up or ship out. If he doesn't change after that, boot his a$$ to the curb.
____________________________
FFXIV - Bruticus Maximus - (excalibur server)
FFXI - Cubby the drunken Galka bard-Retired 7/31/2009
Kujata 75brd/75war/55drg
#17 Nov 28 2009 at 10:25 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
***
1,033 posts
I'm surprised you bothered to make a thread on the matter, the course of action here is obvious.




The only not-so-obvious point brought up is the point of confronting the individual. It probably won't get him to change his ways, but he gets the knowledge that he hasn't been fooling anybody... right before you dismiss him.
____________________________
Level 75 Scruffy/37 Nerfherder

"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world, the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man."

- George Bernard Shaw
#18 Nov 28 2009 at 10:48 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,987 posts
Point the player to this thread and show him how he is about to get the boot. Chances are he will kick himself out of your LS without you guys doing practically anything.
____________________________
=10 is about My Little Pony.
Some people say I'm the DEVIL.
Aluus wrote:
NOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU EVIL EVIL *******!!!!!!!!

KaneIsthara wrote:
You are the devil. Now it's gonna happen.

Kaolian wrote:
Also Tofu. We totally ban over Tofu as well.

My Brute - Valiarius
#19 Nov 29 2009 at 1:20 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,608 posts
Just boot him. He's already been given several chances.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#20 Nov 29 2009 at 2:32 AM Rating: Excellent
*
166 posts
I'd say discreetly ask members of your LS (with your shellholder's blessing) what their opinions are. If you've got a 50/50 sort of situation, where half like him, then you've got a real problem, and how to solve it without pissing anyone off is... a difficult question. More than likely, though, you've got about 80% of the shell as irritated as you are, and the other 20% indifferent. That'll make it a lot easier to pull the trigger, and will also reassure other members that sackholders don't make arbitrary decisions without consulting everyone a little first.

Win/win I'd say, barring that aforementioned 50/50 scenario, in which case, good luck.
____________________________
Enjoy your retirement, Vhailor of Cerberus.
#21 Nov 29 2009 at 2:48 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
****
4,634 posts
Why give him a chance? Then he'll just be doing things for your Linkshell that he honestly doesn't want to do. You don't want someone like that around. If he doesn't have the spirit for it, **** him and kick him. Seriously, just kick him. He's just going to be a liability.
____________________________
Hume male, Zafire, Server: Sylph
50DNC, 50SMN, 50BRD, 50SAM, 50DRG, 50WHM, 52THF, 52COR, 52MNK, 58BST, 60WAR, 67PLD, 69PUP, 75RNG, 75SCH, 75BLM, 80NIN, 80DRK, 85BLU, 85RDM
Retired since February 2011.
All SJ's capped for LVL99!

#22 Nov 29 2009 at 6:29 AM Rating: Good
****
9,043 posts
Sounds like one of those people who thinks XI is an offline game with a built in chat program to get help with things.

I think he just needs a reality check. And if that doesn't work... boot him.
____________________________
Likibiki ~ 75 WHM ~ 75 SAM ~ 75 THF ~ 75 SMN ~ 74 NIN
Pandemonium Server, FFXI. Retired. Gone but not forgotten.
Cailey ~ 90 DNC ~ 90 RDM ~ 90 BLM
Asura Server, FFXI. Adventurer Extraordinaire.
#23 Nov 29 2009 at 6:31 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
Avatar
**
633 posts
Next time you ask yourself the question "Should I boot this person that brings myself or the LS down?" do '/sea all'.

The 1000+ people listed as currently playing should reinforce the simple fact there there are just that many potential players that can fill his spot.

I have not even mentioned that not kicking a person that behaves that way will negatively reflect on your leadership skills within your LS. Chances are that other people in the LS may have a problem with said player as well.

It also sounds like you do not have a set of guidelines posted for proper behavior within the LS. Nor a warning system of any kind. The great thing about a written set of rules and warning system, is that you can boot someone without having to explain yourself. You are following your own rules and everyone else now knows that those rules mean something. It is no longer a "personal" issue but a uniform standard accepted by everyone in the LS including yourself. If you have a forum setup for your LS I would suggest making a "Rules" post asap, in a social LS that can include all that you mentioned by the way.
____________________________
"BSTito, ergo erat..." (I BST, therefore I was.) -Rennne Decarrtee, Mithran Philosopher
#24KojiroSoma, Posted: Nov 29 2009 at 7:37 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) You know, if you have to post on a message board about if you should kick a guy or not, than clearly you've already crossed the kicking line and are just here for justification.
#25 Nov 29 2009 at 9:03 AM Rating: Excellent
Jack of All Trades
******
29,628 posts
Quote:
Fact is, all that remains is the 5000 gil. To put things in perspective, kicking someone over 5000 gil is about as stupid as that guy the other day who got kicked for not D2'ing someone. And we all withnessed the uproar that caused, it's four pages long.


And for the second time, you miss the point. These people are not being kicked for not providing d2 or 5k or whatever; the OP even says 5k is not going to make or break him. They're being kicked because they're being douches about what should be trivial matters.

In other words, it wouldn't matter if it was 5 gil. If you don't know me at all yet still want me to buy something for you, you'd better be willing and able to fully pay for it, up front, and not just assume that "well, it's just 5g/5k/5whatever, it's no big deal" (this is the kind of assumption that friends might be able to make with each other, but not just strangers or even acquaintances) or even worse, try to avoid the issue.

Also, we all have our own sh*t to do in RL. That isn't an excuse for saying that you will help with X event and then consistently bailing on it.

Edited, Nov 29th 2009 10:18am by Fynlar
#26 Nov 29 2009 at 11:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
*
219 posts
You might as well boot him while you have the chance. It sounds like the type of player where someone in ls says, "Gee I haven't seen so-and-so lately", then you see him at like Whitegate AH with a different social pearl on or something. Point being he'll leave sooner or later for another shell to annoy w/o saying so anyway, you should take care of business now.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 0 All times are in CDT