What's Up with the lengthy server-specific downtimes?

Quote Reply

#1 Jun 25 2016 at 5:26 PM Rating: Excellent

snailish

4,580 posts

Sure, it could just be a normal maintenance thing...

Roshen at Offical Boards wrote:

We'll be doing extended maintenance on Vulak`Aerr, Fippy Darkpaw, Lockjaw and Ragefire servers. We'll be doing one of these a day, and during this maintenance each server will be unavailable for approximately 24 hours.

These are scheduled for:
Vulak`Aerr - Down Monday, June 27, 2016, starting at 10AM PDT*
Fippy Darkpaw - Down Tuesday, June 28, 2016, starting at 10AM PDT*
Lockjaw - Down Wednesday, June 29, 2016, starting at 10AM PDT*
Ragefire - Down Thursday, June 30, 2016, starting at 10AM PDT*

...but it just seems suspicious that it is only paired (creation time) progression servers [Vulak is almost zero population, Fippy still progressing. Ragefire has > population than Lockjaw, but both are very viable in contrast to Vulak].

Conspiracy theorists suggest mergers incoming. Anyone hear anything official (i.e., buried in some other thread) or have a different conspiracy? Or is it just boring maintenance as Roshen says. Can you trust an ogre?

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#2 Jun 26 2016 at 4:50 AM Rating: Excellent

Taninger

Guru

178 posts

I should save them some time and just delete the monk I have on Vulak. When I log on I'm usually the only person on the server - which is both scary and interesting at the same time. I have even called out my pulls in general chat "incoming a walrus!" for fun since there's no one listening.

I find it more disconcerting that DBG lets this kind of situation persist. Surely a vacant server cries out for something/anything to be done?

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#3 Jun 26 2016 at 5:22 AM Rating: Excellent

snailish

4,580 posts

Taninger wrote:

I should save them some time and just delete the monk I have on Vulak. When I log on I'm usually the only person on the server - which is both scary and interesting at the same time. I have even called out my pulls in general chat "incoming a walrus!" for fun since there's no one listening.

I find it more disconcerting that DBG lets this kind of situation persist. Surely a vacant server cries out for something/anything to be done?

There was 6 others on Vulak when I logged in yesterday. I remain astounded that the server is up.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#4 Jun 26 2016 at 3:25 PM Rating: Excellent

tatankaseventh

Guru

782 posts

snailish wrote:

There was 6 others on Vulak when I logged in yesterday. I remain astounded that the server is up.

If they are using modern tech for the zone hosts, where it just spins up what's needed, the overhead of maintaining a very-low-pop server may not be very large at all.

____________________________

Tatanka Wolfdancer, 115 Wood Elf Druid, 9 x 300+ Master Artisan, 7 maxed trophies (dang research! :)
Michone, 115 Troll Shadowknight
Anaceup Mysleeves, 115 Erudite Mage, 2 x 300 Master Artisan
Snookims Whinslow, 112 Erudite Enchanter, 2 x 300 Master Artisan
<Inisfree>, Tunare (Seventh Hammer!)

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#5 Jun 26 2016 at 5:17 PM Rating: Excellent

snailish

4,580 posts

tatankaseventh wrote:

snailish wrote:

There was 6 others on Vulak when I logged in yesterday. I remain astounded that the server is up.

If they are using modern tech for the zone hosts, where it just spins up what's needed, the overhead of maintaining a very-low-pop server may not be very large at all.

^ I concur.

I just find the optics of it strange: let a TLP server dry out on the vine when you could relaunch the server as something new. Example: antique loot live in-era, full boxing, FV lootcode, load balance + instances, progression based on 1 week unlocks after open world targets are completed for an expac. Mergers from or to FV allowed when it is caught up in progression. Premium membership to play.

I doubt 20 accounts exclusively pay to play on Vulak. I'd be surprised if there was more than a couple of people paying to box 3-6 accounts there as the only place they play.

Whereas my racing-unlock-liberal loot server proposal (while likely attracting at least one or two toxic guilds based on official board lurking the past few years and probably not a place I would play myself) could easily be one of the most populated servers including into it's live content era.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#6 Jun 27 2016 at 7:02 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1690762642120

71 posts

I don't know about any of that, but I can't log in at all this morning. Tried two different accounts, "There's something wrong with your request" type error message in nice red letters.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#7 Jun 27 2016 at 8:05 AM Rating: Decent

Bana

1 post

I am having the same problem unable to log in -- on 2 accounts keep getting "there was an error completing your request" -- and there is nothing on the Everquest Forums and when you try to log into the forums -- daybreak notice "We are currently undergoing maintenance" so unable to post about log in problems

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#8 Jul 03 2016 at 5:05 PM Rating: Excellent

missjackie

View User Forum

1,055 posts

Zek and AB were down for an extended amount of time as well, not just the TLP servers.

Edit:

"We'll be doing extended maintenance on Zek, Antonius Bayle and The Rathe servers. During this week we'll be doing one of these a day, and during this maintenance it's estimated that each server will be unavailable for up to 24 hours."

Edited, Jul 3rd 2016 7:06pm by missjackie

____________________________

EQ1: Gooshy: http://eq.magelo.com/profile/1870652
EQ2: Gwenythe: http://u.eq2wire.com/soe/character_detail/468152233422

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#9 Jul 07 2016 at 6:48 PM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1690157814975

2 posts

Today, The Rather server , is down for the lengthy server maintenance. That is where I play now.

Does anyone know exactly what is done during the nearly day long maintenance ? I am curious.

It just seems so odd, though, we just had a patch a little over a day ago, and now down for a full day. Why couldnt they consolidate that for some of the servers ?

Thank you for reading this.

▲ Page top

What's Up with the lengthy server-specific downtimes?Follow