Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Two reasons you should not buy further expansions.Follow

#52 Aug 20 2004 at 12:27 PM Rating: Good
**
896 posts
Kaamun wrote:
Still waiting on a GM response from 14-15 months ago...yes months. Over a year ago when Tunare would crash once or twice aday everyday. I lost my rewards for part of a quest i was doing and could not go on with those items and could not do over because you began the quest by turning in a DO DROP item that vah shir shaman get at creation. everytime i petition, a couple hours later i would type /viewpetition it would be gone. I did type in the petition everyday when i logged on to try to get a reason and stopped typing after about 2-3 months.
As of right now, i do not have GoD expansion or pre-ordered Omens and dont know if i will.




Have you submitted again? If so, tell them this and be angry about it...they will respond. I had a support issue with Cisco once that was critical (was working on a hospital's PIX firewall that was down with very strange problems)...they did not respond. I finally called back...later that day, not 15 months later...and someone had closed the ticket by mistake.

Human error happens...and that is not going to change if you add 5000 new CS people. There will still be cases like yours. You are an idiot for waiting for 14-15 months for a response...and an idiot to let one lost quest piece keep you from moving on and enjoying the GAME. And if you do not enjoy it, leave and quit ********* Anyone who keeps playing a game and does not enjoy it is a total complete moron.

I re-read your post...you did try for 2-3 months. Sorry, did not catch that first time through. Try once more and then forget it...is it really that important? I cannot think of one item in game that if I lost it this way it would make me hate the game and not want expansions and to still have fun. Get over it.

Edited, Fri Aug 20 13:29:52 2004 by lhuffman
#53 Aug 20 2004 at 12:55 PM Rating: Default
*
50 posts
Haha this is funny..... Seriously though, it's not worth posting any realistically bad things about EQ on these forums. You'll get some people who agree but others it's like trying to tell a smoker that it's bad for them. They're either in denial and think it's a good thing or agree it's bad but have some reason not to quit. There are alot of games that are better at customer service then SOE is and alot of games comming out that will be as well. Some people like the punishment and if they do so be it. I don't play EQ anymore and haven't for a while but I find it funny to read posts of the still addicted.

(There is even a game coming out (Wish) that is publicly rebeling against Everquest. My kind of game! hehe)
____________________________
You miss every chance you don't take.
#54 Aug 20 2004 at 1:58 PM Rating: Good
***
2,272 posts
They have actually already taken steps to being improving CS. I won't argue that it has been bad over the years, but I personally have never had bad experiences with GMs or guides (mob dispute calls not going my way don't count =p). I've dealt with god knows how many of them, and met quite a few at Fan Faires (even Brenlo, who is cool as hell). The guides themselves are the ones who catch the heat online but their hands are tied by what they are allowed to do to help, which isn't all that much.

The game is good enough (yes still) that people play despite what many see as the worst CS in history. Apparently it isn't that bad for everyone. Likely most people playing have very little contact with CS to discover if it is bad or good, which in itself means something is being done right.

A lot of the people who have issues with CS are just pissed because a GM won't give them a 100% res after they went LD quadding in Cobalt Scar and died. Petition for every little thing and eventually it will catch up.

SOE has it's problems, and CS is certainly among them. I have my days where I hate SOE as much as anyone, but I also still love to play EQ, so like SOE or not they are doing something right. The argument that "another game with better CS will come along and...." has been going on for years now.
____________________________
Tattle
#55 Aug 20 2004 at 3:14 PM Rating: Decent
*
50 posts
One thing I definitely have to point out, and I have heard this pointed out time and time again is that if your MMORPG gaming experience started with a game like EQ you tend to be happy with/put up with the massive problems that are in it. Or you just aren't capable of noticing them. But if your experience started with other games such as UO or AC or (insert game name here) you tend to be pickier with certain things and compare it to said game. I know I started with UO and loved it until they started to change it too much (I think it was when EA took over). But I found the experience quite wonderful, unfortunately after playing a game like that I expected EQ to be like it (as in concentrating on content not leveling up and other like things) Maybe it was a mistake on my part to expect one game to be like another but oh well... I did... and allot of other people did too which causes people to resent the game and notice all the mistakes. Now besides the fact that I now hate the game and haven't played it in a while doesn't mean that I think it's a bad game. It's bad for me yes but if people enjoy it still who am I to say that it's the worst game created right?
My main point is that the MMORPG thing is slowly becoming an industry and as much as you EQ fans don't want to admit it... EQ will most definitely have solid competition eventually. EQ was the best game as far as graphics and immersion of it's time but it would be silly to think it will continue to be so forever. EQ is just now working on customer support and well... good for them but as far as I'm concerned too little to late. They should have thought of that before they started losing customers by the masses. (And if you post saying they haven't then 'whatever' because it's pretty darn obvious. I saw my friend playing a month ago on my server and PoK and other popular zones were almost dead compared to what it used to be and he said it has been like that for a while and seems to be getting worse) Needless to say EQ will hold on to its hardcore gamers for maybe years to come but it doesn't mean it's a better game just because people still play it.
Now as far as the original post he makes a good point but I'm still pretty darn sure that it falls on deaf ears on the most part. Most EQ fanatics will do whatever SOE tells them to whether they really want to or not. The expansion is going to be a hit (especially being that it's quite a good attempt at winning back ex players) and this post will not hinder that in any noticeable way. And truly if you don't like it take the advise I took from a flamer of one of my rants "If you don't like it, play another game" So annoying but so true, it's not worth my time, money or frustration. And if you're getting so upset at the game that you're wishing ill will on SOE as well... take a step back and look at that..... it's a game you should be having fun, not getting stressed. Anyway I'm done with my long winded reply, flame away.
____________________________
You miss every chance you don't take.
#56 Aug 20 2004 at 3:20 PM Rating: Good
**
896 posts
Squishy wrote:
But if your experience started with other games such as UO or AC or (insert game name here) you tend to be pickier with certain things and compare it to said game.


OK, you are joking right? I started on UO...played it for about a year...dropped it when EQ came out. Never regretted that move. UO was fine, but EQ was so much bigger and better, even with the bugs.

As for AC, I tried it. It sucked. graphics were nice...big expanses with lots of nothing. Almost everyone I knew who left for AC came back.

I guess you really have to look at which of the three games you have mentioned are actually still around. Didn't UO just cancel the release of their latest effort?
#57 Aug 20 2004 at 3:32 PM Rating: Decent
*
50 posts
Yer a little behind the times but yeah..... Obviously totally missed the point but oh well. The point is if you started with another game and actually 'played' and 'enjoyed' it OF COURSE you're going to compare new games to it. If you didn't... then EQ is really your first real experiance. I myself care more about content and ease of play then the fact that a game is big. Just because you didn't like UO AC or whatever the hell game you tried doesn't mean it sucks it means YOU didn't like it, just like SOME PEOPLE don't like EQ. It's called personal preference.. live with it. Just because your personal preference is EQ doesn't mean I have to say "Hey MR. Ihuff here says this game is the best so I might as well play it!" This game is not for me and not for alot of other people... thats why we go and play other games and enjoy them. It's not like I'd go back to UO now, it's had its time and in MY opinion so has EQ. Other people continue to enjoy it and more power to them but 'I' don't enjoy it and if someone else doesn't they have a right to.
And for people that enjoy it but are having a hard time getting past some of the bugs and CS problems who the hell are you to tell them they are wrong? Let them get their frustration out by posting and move on. It doesn't say in the Rules of Conduct that you have to defend EQ till your dieing breath. EQ has problems... people will complain about problems... thats kinda the way things work....
____________________________
You miss every chance you don't take.
#58 Aug 21 2004 at 7:35 PM Rating: Decent
I work with customer service every day. When you wait 8 hours on hold to speak to a CSR that barely speaks English about a bill that totals $250,000.(When you are billing a patient that kind of money you wait. But then again I have 3 lines) And then have to wait 20 more minutes for a superviser only to be told they are closed now "Can you call back tomorrow?" THEN you have something to complain about.

I have been summoned, rezzed & LED to a site by a GM. With usually less than 20 min wait.

I have had items returned to me on my word of honor only.

I have actually had a GM play with me for a time because of an issue I raised & she/he wanted to see if it was a bug or my error.

My only gripe is the time I have to play usually matches the time they want to do patches. <shrug> It still costs me less a month than going to 2 movies & keeps me entertained for a couple hours a couple days a week ( I am a "casual" player about 16 hours or so a week )

Things could be better. But in the long run I have run into LOTS worse where I work
____________________________
Charai Bandroichta, the ATTRACTIVE halfling Druid,Gathering of Minds(late of Lords of Crom), Drinal

** just my 2 coppers worth **
#59 Aug 21 2004 at 8:13 PM Rating: Decent
6 posts
Seems to me it is all a question of what you are hoping to get out of your EQ experience. Whether a die hard gamer or casual player you have a right to expect good service, but geez, why sweat the petty stuff. You think they are just sitting around their comp, telling each other, "look watch how long I make this dude wait for an answer, it's been 3 days so far, hahaha". Instead of waiting for that ulcer to explode, why not just go make another toon and farm for awhile or help a newb. Hey maybe something really old school, like read a book.
#60 Aug 26 2004 at 2:10 PM Rating: Decent
Some people don't experience long waits for customer service. I understand that. But almost e veryone can tell horror stories of friends who lost items, lost quests, sat waiting under the world, etc and got no support for hours. And you're just selling yourself short by excusing SOE's poor customer service by saying they have hundreds of thousands of customers to tend to. That's their issue. That's something they've ignored since the beginning of the game and had they not, you wouldn't be getting ignored by their GMs at this point.

As for what's a resonable amount of time: Most people don't play the game all day long. They get on do parts to a quest, grind, or whatever. They don't want to sit out half the time they are online waiting for a GM or a Guide to stop by and help them out. They should expect immediate service.

Customer service is the cornerstone to any company. Where a company forgets that they lose customers. It's obvious that enough people aren't satisfied with their support by the fact that this thread is growing.

Anyone who isn't complaining about customer support or agreeing with my orignal post is basically saying "Look we know customer support sucks, but deal with it." Well why have that attitude? Why not expect more from Sony? You deserve it right?
#61 Aug 31 2004 at 9:32 PM Rating: Default
*
244 posts
edited due to late night typos

Edited, Tue Aug 31 22:36:00 2004 by Chaongel
#62 Aug 31 2004 at 11:31 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,376 posts
Taleswapper wrote:
Some people don't experience long waits for customer service. I understand that. But almost e veryone can tell horror stories of friends who lost items, lost quests, sat waiting under the world, etc and got no support for hours. And you're just selling yourself short by excusing SOE's poor customer service by saying they have hundreds of thousands of customers to tend to. That's their issue. That's something they've ignored since the beginning of the game and had they not, you wouldn't be getting ignored by their GMs at this point.


Same can be said for anything though. I've personally never had any trouble or delay taking a flight. And most of the people I know have never had any troubles (aside from the expected amount of time it takes obviously). But we've all heard "stories" of someone who had an absolute nightmare flight, where they got delayed at the gate, and their pass got lost, and their luggage ended up in a 3rd world country without them, and a whole list of "horrible" things.

Yeah. Bad things happen. And in a large enough sample size over a long enough period of time, anyone can amass a list of "horror stories" if they actively seek them out.

My point is that just becuase you can find such stories, and maybe even had something happen to you, does not mean that the majority of players have had the same experiences, nor that this is the normal level of service.


Quote:
As for what's a resonable amount of time: Most people don't play the game all day long. They get on do parts to a quest, grind, or whatever. They don't want to sit out half the time they are online waiting for a GM or a Guide to stop by and help them out. They should expect immediate service.


And your "immediate service" need is more important then the 80 other people who are having a problem right at this very minute? This is why I suspect that most people who really ***** about CS do so because to some degree they are extremely self centered. You think only about your inconvenience. What about everyone else? The GMs are not in the game go wait on just you hand and foot. And guess what? Your minor little issue isn't that important that you can't wait until the major ones are dealt with.

The only things that require immediate service are instances where you cannot continue playing without help. A KS dispute does not qualify. A minor bug does not qualify. Losing one kill to a bug does not qualify. Even dying to a bug does not qualify. You can play. And it's not like a death is that big of a deal. Get a rez and move on. At the higher levels of the game, you get used to dying frequently. It's just not that big a deal. I would *never* sit around waiting for a rez. Even if it took only a half hour for a GM to rez me, I could have made up the difference in exp in that time if I'd just gotten a cleric to rez me and then gone out hunting.

Quote:
Customer service is the cornerstone to any company. Where a company forgets that they lose customers. It's obvious that enough people aren't satisfied with their support by the fact that this thread is growing.


Yes. But there's a point at which adding more money for CS is a waste. It's a pretty simple calculation. Add up how much you'd have to pay for more GMs or CS people. Figure out how many fewer people on average will quit your game if you don't. If the second number is lower then the first, then you don't hire more people.

It's amazing how often people who have no concept of how business really works will make grand sweeping statements about what a company should be doing for them.

I've known a few people who've quit playing EQ just because they got bored. I've known a few people who've quit playing EQ because RL issues came along that made game time difficult. I've known a few people who've quit playing EQ to go play another game. In 5+ years of playing EQ, despite reading literally thousands of posts from people threatening to quit, I do not personally know a single person who has actually quit playing EQ becuase the CS wasn't good enough.

Not one. So. What should they spend their money on? Based on that info (and I'm betting just about everyone who plays, if they think about people who've left will see the same pattern), what should SOE be putting their money into? Lets see. More content will prevent people from getting bored. More expansions (and EQ2) will reduce the numbers of people who'll leave for other games. They can't do a darn thing about RL issues, but making the game as available as possible (like servers in other countries for example) can help a bit.

And yet people ***** when SOE just puts more money into new expansions and new games and not enough into CS for the games they do have! Yeah. I wonder why that is...

They know their cusotmers better then their customers know themselves. You all talk about quitting, but I'd bet that less then .01% of those who say that ever do. Why should they listen to you? Especially when IMHO, those who complain the most about CS are those with the most unrealistic expectations about what they should be getting for their 13 bucks a month. If those guys leave, good riddance! They were costing more then they were bringing in. If you take up more then a couple hours of a GMs time in a month, then you are costing them more then you are paying them. It's simple math that they'd have no problems at all if you quit. The customers they want to keep are the ones who play the game, don't expect the world from the CS, and don't constantly complain when everything isn't perfect.

Quote:
Anyone who isn't complaining about customer support or agreeing with my orignal post is basically saying "Look we know customer support sucks, but deal with it." Well why have that attitude? Why not expect more from Sony? You deserve it right?



No. We're saying that Sony CS is about normal for what we'd expect for 13 bucks a month. We're happy with it. I don't expect more from Sony because I don't pay enough to sony to expect it.

I work in an industry where we pay millions of dollars a year for support contracts that include immediate on the phone 24 hour support. I simply do not expect that level of support when only paying $13 a month. I understand that they cannot possibly afford to make everyone who plays their game happy. Their best bet is to make the game experience as good as possible for those with reasonable expectations and ignore the whiners.

I'm sorry. I simply completely disagree with you. At what point did we become such a "me" society that we automatically expect that any service, no matter how little we are paying for it, should be better because "we deserve it". Ok. Tell me this. What exactly did *you* do to "deserve" better service? Are you a special unique snowflake and deserver special treatment? Cause they sure as hell can't afford to provide that level of service for everyone...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#63 Sep 01 2004 at 8:46 AM Rating: Decent
**
264 posts
Gotta agree with gbaji. Cust Svc is not having a person ready to fix your particular problem.

I mean look at grocery stores on a Sunday morning. You typically have to wait in line at the checkout, but will that wait cause you to go grocery shopping someplace else? No. Why? Because it is expected that you may have to wait to pay for your groceries and where you go is much more dependent on the foods that you buy. By some's thinking replacing SOE with a grocery store, that there should be a checkout line reserved solely for them.
____________________________
Tigerklaw
84 Beastlord
Voelfgar Fireforge
68th Bartender of Brell
Krrill
71st Assassin of Bristlebane
Braeger
77th Shaman
The Rathe
#64 Sep 05 2004 at 6:51 PM Rating: Decent
I deleted this char about 6 months after I created it. It's not my only char. I have chars ranging in lvls from 2 to 65. I've been playing for three or four years. My highest char is flagged for Temple of Solusek Ro. I've been around the game long enough to know SOE does not reply to customer service issues in game in a timely manner - hell that only takes about 2 months to come to that conclusion...
#65 Sep 05 2004 at 7:14 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
619 posts
Quote:
My highest char is flagged for Temple of Solusek Ro


Damn, they put a lock on the Temple's front door? The plasmatic priest must be sick of all the clerics killing him.


1 2 3 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 0 All times are in CDT